A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Another mid-air (UK)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 15th 14, 04:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bruce Hoult[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 38
Default Another mid-air (UK)

On 2014-08-07 15:46:30 +0000, Ramy said:

Even with 8m accuracy, It is more than sufficient for accurate
collision avoidance, unless someone considers half a wingspan not
accurate enough for collision warning with another glider or obstacle.


Even the old 100m accuracy when "selective availability" was turned on
was good enough for avoiding antennas or wires etc. It's not as if you
are going to fly as close as you can to them.

Also, note that the errors are not random. Two GPS receivers in the
same area at the same time will show the same error, in the same
direction (to within 6 or 8 m), thus making their relative locations
accurate enough.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.