Toxic Depleted Uranium Rounds... for Brooks

"The Enlightenment" wrote in message
...



I believe the M1A2 has dropped the DU armour in favour of Chobham
style armour.



And what exactly do you think is used in Chobham armour ?

Hint: its generally believed to be made of layers
of ceramic and some hard heavy metal.

Keith

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

"The Enlightenment" wrote in message
...



I believe the M1A2 has dropped the DU armour in favour of Chobham
style armour.



And what exactly do you think is used in Chobham armour ?

Hint: its generally believed to be made of layers
of ceramic and some hard heavy metal.

Not originally, from what I have read. IIRC the original composition was
reportedly steel with a ceramic layer (or layers), with the DU being added
later by the US (I don't recall its being used by the Challenger II?).

Brooks


Keith

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...


Not originally, from what I have read. IIRC the original composition was
reportedly steel with a ceramic layer (or layers), with the DU being added
later by the US (I don't recall its being used by the Challenger II?).

Brooks


Challenger II is officially listed as being protected by
second generation Chobham armour, the exact
composition os of course secret but the understanding
I have is it uses either DU or tungsten in place of
the steel in first generation armor

Keith

"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...

"Kevin Brooks" wrote in message
...


Not originally, from what I have read. IIRC the original composition was
reportedly steel with a ceramic layer (or layers), with the DU being
added
later by the US (I don't recall its being used by the Challenger II?).

Brooks


Challenger II is officially listed as being protected by
second generation Chobham armour, the exact
composition os of course secret but the understanding
I have is it uses either DU or tungsten in place of
the steel in first generation armor

Odd, since from what I have read the aggregate weight increase between
Challeneger I and Challeneger II is only about 500 kg; OTOH, the change from
the M1 to the M1A1 brought a change in weight of about six *tons* (and that
change from the 105mm to the 120mm gun did not account for a great deal of
that, I'd imagine). How could they have switched to a DU (or tungsten) armor
package and only increase the vehicle weight by some thousand pounds plus in
the case of Challenger?

Brooks


Keith

In article ,
on Tue, 11 May 2004 13:03:37 +0100,
Keith Willshaw attempted to say .....


"The Enlightenment" wrote in message
...



I believe the M1A2 has dropped the DU armour in favour of Chobham
style armour.



And what exactly do you think is used in Chobham armour ?

Hint: its generally believed to be made of layers
of ceramic and some hard heavy metal.


Marshmellows, graham crackers and hershey bars............


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

On Wed, 12 May 2004 02:14:00 GMT, Tank Fixer
wrote:


And what exactly do you think is used in Chobham armour ?

Hint: its generally believed to be made of layers
of ceramic and some hard heavy metal.


Marshmellows, graham crackers and hershey bars............

Nah, 100% pure depleted unobtainium.


greg

--
"vying with Platt for the largest gap
between capability and self perception"