A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

alternative McCready theory and variometers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 27th 14, 02:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Evan Ludeman[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 484
Default alternative McCready theory and variometers

On Monday, October 27, 2014 9:24:05 AM UTC-4, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:55:20 -0700, Tibor Arpas wrote:

And If I understand you correctly the 302 and ClearNav then have what I
called "relative netto" audio. (relative netto indicates the vertical
speed the glider would achieve IF it flies at thermalling speed)
But how much is it skewed with MC settings?

Not quite. 'Netto' mode tells you what the air mass is doing by
subtracting the glider's polar from the vario indication. When My SDI C4
vario is in cruise mode it bases its STF indication (both display and
sounds) on what it thinks the air mass is doing. I imagine that the 302
and Clearnav do much the same.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |


302 audio and pointer give "relative netto" (I dislike this term, it should be "relative vario", but I've lost that battle) which is "the climb rate that you would achieve if you slowed to thermaling speed and adopted a 45 degree bank". Roughly speaking, it is netto - 2 knots, but the calculated value depends on polar, density altitude, wing loading & bugs. ClearNav CNv offers three cruise modes for audio, two for the pointer. Audio choices are relative netto, netto or STF. Pointer choices are relative netto or netto.

STF audio provides useful information, but I tire of the "chatter". I find I prefer relative netto modes, with sink tones off. It does mean that I need to scan the panel a little more often in cruise.

Evan Ludeman (on behalf of CNi)
  #2  
Old October 27th 14, 02:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Evan Ludeman[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 484
Default alternative McCready theory and variometers

On Monday, October 27, 2014 10:03:35 AM UTC-4, Evan Ludeman wrote:
On Monday, October 27, 2014 9:24:05 AM UTC-4, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:55:20 -0700, Tibor Arpas wrote:

And If I understand you correctly the 302 and ClearNav then have what I
called "relative netto" audio. (relative netto indicates the vertical
speed the glider would achieve IF it flies at thermalling speed)
But how much is it skewed with MC settings?

Not quite. 'Netto' mode tells you what the air mass is doing by
subtracting the glider's polar from the vario indication. When My SDI C4
vario is in cruise mode it bases its STF indication (both display and
sounds) on what it thinks the air mass is doing. I imagine that the 302
and Clearnav do much the same.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |


302 audio and pointer give "relative netto" (I dislike this term, it should be "relative vario", but I've lost that battle) which is "the climb rate that you would achieve if you slowed to thermaling speed and adopted a 45 degree bank". Roughly speaking, it is netto - 2 knots, but the calculated value depends on polar, density altitude, wing loading & bugs. ClearNav CNv offers three cruise modes for audio, two for the pointer. Audio choices are relative netto, netto or STF. Pointer choices are relative netto or netto.

STF audio provides useful information, but I tire of the "chatter". I find I prefer relative netto modes, with sink tones off. It does mean that I need to scan the panel a little more often in cruise.

Evan Ludeman (on behalf of CNi)


I mis-wrote about the C-302. One can select TE or Netto modes for cruise in the PC/PDA configuration program, but I suggest that you probably won't like the results. I found these modes buggy and prone to indicating thermals that didn't exist. In relative netto mode, the 302 is a decent vario, and I still use one for backup.

-Evan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
McCready Theory Used by Birds [email protected] Soaring 1 February 20th 13 10:17 PM
Source for a PZL 80mm McCready Ring Travis Beach Soaring 0 June 14th 07 04:05 PM
Source for a PZL 80mm McCready Ring Travis Beach Soaring 0 June 14th 07 04:04 PM
Pictures of Dr.Paul McCready at SSA Convention Gary Boggs Soaring 0 February 23rd 05 05:20 PM
McCready Speed ring for ASW-20 Jeff Dorwart Soaring 1 May 5th 04 12:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.