![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, 31 October 2014 02:04:10 UTC+2, Ramy wrote:
While I am not looking forward for any automatic controls, I agree with the OP that FBW will significant improve performance. I believe the lost of performance due to inaccurate pilot input, un centered yaw string (heavy foot), non optimal flap position (I estimate I am flying in non optimal flap position maybe 30% of the time especially when doing a lot of transitions), flying too slow/too fast etc hurts performance more than the difference in glide performance between modern gliders. Ramy Yes and we have to remember that whole concept of conventional glider with tail has built-in-drag as elevator pushes the tail down all the time instead of giving only occasional control inputs. I bet there is several extra % of drag right there, as is in the large wetted area of long rear fuselage and rudder, which is only needed to counteract the yaw created by aileron drag. Flight controls have to be designed to have nice feel and harmony. Would there be more aerodynamically optimal geometries if this would be a non-issue? You could program any control feel you wish to joystick. New wingprofiles (current are from nineties BTW, Ventus 2 & ASW 27 etc.) could be used with more narrow area of optimum angle-of-attack as FBW could nail it indefinetly while thermalling. One could speculate with safety aspects as well. FBW would be easily programmed with unability to stall. Think about it, only coordinated turns, if you pull the stick while thermalling low, nose would go up until close to stalling angle of attack but not an inch more. I believe hardware is coming cheaper and easily available as this is all stuff that UAVs use right now. You probably got most of the required sensors in your pocket right now. And I bet that at least some Akaflieg have studied this concept already. Would we want FBW controlled glider? Did we want glider made from glassfibre instead of wood during 60s? Electrical varios during 70s? Or GPS in 90s? PW5? (No wait, no-one wanted that.) THEY ALL RUINED THE SPORT when introduced, remember? ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One thing to consider is what will happen when the FBW will fail from some reason and you end up with pilots who don't know how to fly manually as happened to AF447.
Ramy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/31/2014 3:22 PM, Ramy wrote:
One thing to consider is what will happen when the FBW will fail from some reason and you end up with pilots who don't know how to fly manually as happened to AF447. Ramy Are you saying that simply pushing the "Return to Gliderport" button might not always be an option? Vaughn |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the 757 fly by wire? | [email protected] | Piloting | 7 | October 3rd 08 07:26 PM |
Can anyone help, PLEASE - searching for zip-cord (aka: mono-cord, speaker wire, shooting wire, dbl hookup, rainbow cable, ribbon cable) | Striker Cat | Home Built | 6 | October 15th 04 08:51 PM |
Can anyone help, PLEASE - searching for zip-cord (aka: mono-cord, speaker wire, shooting wire, dbl hookup, rainbow cable, ribbon cable) | Striker Cat | General Aviation | 0 | October 12th 04 05:11 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Owning | 24 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |
Please help -- It's down to the wire | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 18 | July 14th 04 06:05 PM |