A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Where is the LX S80?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 6th 14, 10:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default Where is the LX S80?

On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 8:31:07 PM UTC-5, Craig Funston wrote:
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 3:22:46 PM UTC-8, Andy Blackburn wrote:
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 3:10:29 PM UTC-8, jfitch wrote:

I think you need to recheck your math. 600 fpm is 10 fps. That would be around 20 ft at 1G with no other retarding forces and mass = weight. But in this case mass weight depending on the buoyancy, i.e., much less than 1G deceleration acting on it. When the density matches the surrounding air, the air bubble is weightless (A due to G = 0), and therefore will carry on forever absent another retarding force. Of course as it rises through an inversion of less dense air, it will lose buoyancy and G will begin to have some effect, also there are frictional effects of the surrounding atmosphere which I imagine are hard to calculate. Much for that 1.6 feet though.


Must've missed a decimal place, but even with that corrected, the inertial effects seem to be a lot less than the buoyancy effects, which is mostly driven by temperature profile in the atmosphere versus a dry adiabat. Humidity matters a little, but is the equivalent of a a fraction of a degree to maybe a couple of degrees of temperature variation - which is way less than the variations you see in a typical sounding. Temperature seems like more than an order of magnitude more important than humidity, which itself is roughly an order of magnitude more important than inertia effects.

Where's Dr Jack when I need him?

9B


The inertial effects are inversely proportional to the thread drift coefficient...

Cheers,
Craig


Length of the thread is also inversely proportional to relevance to the real world.
UH
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.