A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GW Bu$h's Torture Chambers and Rape rooms ...!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 14th 04, 05:57 PM
Fred the Red Shirt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Yardpilot" wrote in message news:paUoc.43283$536.7599994@attbi_s03...
"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
om...
"Yardpilot" wrote in message

news:74ooc.33144$536.6041503@attbi_s03...
"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
om...
...

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact

From the source you provide:

A month later, General Karpinski was formally admonished
and quietly suspended, and a major investigation into the
Army's prison system, authorized by Lieutenant General
Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq, was
under way. A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New
Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba and not
meant for public release, was completed in late February.

Sounds like a coverup to me.

In your dreams.


The guest today on the Diane Rnem show was Senator John McCain,
a man who knows about the abuse of prisoners. The first thing
Ms Rhem asked him was if he had ever recieved an answer from
Rumsfeld and the DOD to his question about the chain of
command at Abu Graib. He replied that he had received the chart
which the witnesses had neglected (his choice of words) to bring
to the hearing but that chart did not clarify the issue and he
STILL had not received an answer as to hwo the chain of command
was organised at Abu Graib.


That doesn't support your claim. In fact, it is laughably off-point.


As you know this shows that the DOD is STILL stonewalling, refusing
to provide the information needed to identify the respnsible officers
and officials.

Can you provide a link to the UCMJ online?

--

FF
  #3  
Old May 17th 04, 05:02 PM
Fred the Red Shirt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(GS) wrote in message ...

Can you provide proof that there are in fact officers and
officials witholding information?


Reviewing the thread we see:

"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
om...
...


The guest today on the Diane Rnem show was Senator John McCain,
.... The first thing
Ms Rhem asked him was if he had ever received an answer from
Rumsfeld and the DOD to his question about the chain of
command at Abu Graib. He replied ...he
STILL had not received an answer as to hwo the chain of command
was organised at Abu Graib.


Yardbird wrote:
That doesn't support your claim. In fact, it is laughably off-point.



In article ,
(Fred the Red Shirt) wrote:

As you know this shows that the DOD is STILL stonewalling, refusing
to provide the information needed to identify the respnsible officers
and officials.

Can you provide a link to the UCMJ online?


(GS) wrote in message ...

Can you provide proof that there are in fact officers and
officials witholding information?


John McCain say that he had not received the information
that he requested. Sen McCain said that what he received
in response to his request did NOT answer the question.

I take John McCain at his word on this. I cannot prove
to you that I heard John McCain say those things.

A failure to provide the requested information does not
prove that it is being deliberately withheld, but the
alternative explanations, for example, no one at teh DOD
actually knowing what the chain of command was, seems
rather unlikely, don't you agree?

See also:

http://www.democracynow.org/article..../05/17/1431219


--

FF
  #4  
Old May 18th 04, 05:47 AM
Yardpilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
om...
"Yardpilot" wrote in message

news:paUoc.43283$536.7599994@attbi_s03...
"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
om...
"Yardpilot" wrote in message

news:74ooc.33144$536.6041503@attbi_s03...
"Fred the Red Shirt" wrote in message
om...
...

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040510fa_fact

From the source you provide:

A month later, General Karpinski was formally admonished
and quietly suspended, and a major investigation into the
Army's prison system, authorized by Lieutenant General
Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior commander in Iraq, was
under way. A fifty-three-page report, obtained by The New
Yorker, written by Major General Antonio M. Taguba and not
meant for public release, was completed in late February.

Sounds like a coverup to me.

In your dreams.

The guest today on the Diane Rnem show was Senator John McCain,
a man who knows about the abuse of prisoners. The first thing
Ms Rhem asked him was if he had ever recieved an answer from
Rumsfeld and the DOD to his question about the chain of
command at Abu Graib. He replied that he had received the chart
which the witnesses had neglected (his choice of words) to bring
to the hearing but that chart did not clarify the issue and he
STILL had not received an answer as to hwo the chain of command
was organised at Abu Graib.


That doesn't support your claim. In fact, it is laughably off-point.


As you know this shows that the DOD is STILL stonewalling, refusing
to provide the information needed to identify the respnsible officers
and officials.


No, but fantisize all you want.

Can you provide a link to the UCMJ online?


Yes. Can't you?

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ucmj.htm


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.