A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Non-TE probe compensation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 15, 06:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tim Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 751
Default Non-TE probe compensation

I don't remember the V7 having a non-TE option. I fly with a V7 hooked to my TE Probe and a 302 electronically compensated. They are very similar in response so I have been impressed how well the 302 works non-TE. I configured my panel so that the two varios would be independent in case I lost the TE system for some reason.

As for the B Box, not sure anyone knows how to service one now. They have tubes that are likely rotted inside so I would not trust one. I have one on the self but have never used it.

TT
  #2  
Old January 27th 15, 03:23 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Richard[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 551
Default Non-TE probe compensation

On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 10:04:12 PM UTC-8, Tim Taylor wrote:
I don't remember the V7 having a non-TE option. I fly with a V7 hooked to my TE Probe and a 302 electronically compensated. They are very similar in response so I have been impressed how well the 302 works non-TE. I configured my panel so that the two varios would be independent in case I lost the TE system for some reason.

As for the B Box, not sure anyone knows how to service one now. They have tubes that are likely rotted inside so I would not trust one. I have one on the self but have never used it.

TT


The V7 has electronic compensation but,

Electronic TE compensation is only effective when the pitot tube and static sources are colocated
and the pneumatic lines to the instrument are approximately the same length.. The
best sensor to use is the combined pitot/static Prandtl tube. If problems are experienced
with the electronic TE compensation the most likely cause is the glider's static source. The
static source can be checked by plumbing the pneumatic tubes for electronic compensation
and then setting the TE: to 0%. In still air accelerate to approximately 160 km/h and slowly
reduce the speed. Observe the vario indicator. If the static source is good the vario should
immediately start to move to show a climb. If the needle firstly shows increased sink and
then moves to a climb, the static source of the glider is unsuitable and there is no way to
provide successful TE compensation electronically. The use of a dedicated and accurate finmounted
pitot/static source such as a Prandtl tube might help.


Richard
www.craggyaero.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY compensation tube Waveguru Soaring 6 June 10th 14 05:52 PM
TE Compensation Question Hellman Soaring 6 June 20th 09 08:39 PM
Pilot Compensation - FAR 61.113 CAE Piloting 12 February 7th 06 10:21 PM
Compensation vs. Cost sharing? Mark Morissette Piloting 9 April 19th 05 05:42 AM
Cambridge 302 compensation opinions Caracole Soaring 8 June 27th 04 08:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.