A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Non-TE probe compensation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 15, 08:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Mike C
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 337
Default Non-TE probe compensation

On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 7:47:59 PM UTC-7, Ale.L (RL) wrote:
Hi folks!

Has anyone had any experience with non-TE compensated vario systems? From what I gather there're a few options out the

* There's the varios (and flight computers with integrated varios) like the CAI 302 and LxNav V7 that have electronic compensation as an option. Any others out there?

* There's also the Schuemann box. They are hard to come by so if anyone can share any experience with those that'd be much appreciated.

* And there's the diaphragm type total energy compensators like the PZL KWEC.

Any other options out there?

If you can share your thoughts and the pros/cons in your experience with each of these systems and how it compares to a system with a regular TE probe I'd be very thankful.

Cheers,

Ale.L (RL)


The Westerboer 1020 Vario has electronic TE. Works well.
  #2  
Old January 27th 15, 09:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Galloway[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 215
Default Non-TE probe compensation

The choice of vario is far less important than quality of the pressure
sources. For electronic TE to work well you need very accurate static
and dynamic pressure sources. In practice that means a pitot/static
probe. If you don't have that then stick with a TE probe - the best of
which is the ESA- systems twin prong probe mounted with the
prongs horizontal.

In a perfect world an ESA-system triple probe gives you the option of
the best possible TE probe or electronic compensation.

Like many others I have an LX 9000 and the triple probe. Very much
to my surprise I find it better set up for electronic TE than probe TE.

John Galloway

At 08:03 27 January 2015, Mike C wrote:
On Monday, January 26, 2015 at 7:47:59 PM UTC-7, Ale.L (RL)

wrote:
Hi folks!

Has anyone had any experience with non-TE compensated vario

systems? From
what I gather there're a few options out the

* There's the varios (and flight computers with integrated varios)

like
the CAI 302 and LxNav V7 that have electronic compensation as an

option.
Any others out there?

* There's also the Schuemann box. They are hard to come by so if

anyone
can share any experience with those that'd be much appreciated.

* And there's the diaphragm type total energy compensators like

the PZL
KWEC.

Any other options out there?

If you can share your thoughts and the pros/cons in your

experience with
each of these systems and how it compares to a system with a

regular TE
probe I'd be very thankful.

Cheers,

Ale.L (RL)


The Westerboer 1020 Vario has electronic TE. Works well.


  #3  
Old January 27th 15, 02:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 266
Default Non-TE probe compensation

I have flown with a Winter or Sage connected to the TE probe and a C302 on 100% electronic compensation. Very little difference. In fact, I prefered the C302 because it was less jumpy and didn't seem to be giving me as many false indications of lift due to horizontal gusts.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DIY compensation tube Waveguru Soaring 6 June 10th 14 05:52 PM
TE Compensation Question Hellman Soaring 6 June 20th 09 08:39 PM
Pilot Compensation - FAR 61.113 CAE Piloting 12 February 7th 06 10:21 PM
Compensation vs. Cost sharing? Mark Morissette Piloting 9 April 19th 05 05:42 AM
Cambridge 302 compensation opinions Caracole Soaring 8 June 27th 04 08:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.