|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
January 27th 15, 02:07 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
Non-TE probe compensation
I have flown with a Winter or Sage connected to the TE probe and a C302 on 100% electronic compensation. Very little difference. In fact, I prefered the C302 because it was less jumpy and didn't seem to be giving me as many false indications of lift due to horizontal gusts.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIY compensation tube | Waveguru | Soaring | 6 | June 10th 14 05:52 PM |
| TE Compensation Question | Hellman | Soaring | 6 | June 20th 09 08:39 PM |
| Pilot Compensation - FAR 61.113 | CAE | Piloting | 12 | February 7th 06 10:21 PM |
| Compensation vs. Cost sharing? | Mark Morissette | Piloting | 9 | April 19th 05 05:42 AM |
| Cambridge 302 compensation opinions | Caracole | Soaring | 8 | June 27th 04 08:19 PM |
Hybrid Mode
