A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

K2 vs. StarkPower LiFePo4 batteries



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 4th 15, 05:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default K2 vs. StarkPower LiFePo4 batteries

On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 3:50:28 PM UTC-8, Dave Springford wrote:
I'll preface my remarks with the statement that I sell K2 batteries.

The K2's are made in the USA, not Chinese knock-offs. K2 pays a fee to the patent holder while the knock-off's do not. K2 has also had their batteries UL certified and listed.

These items account for some of the price difference.

The K2 also have a higher Watt-hour rating at 123 vs 115 for the Stark and the K2 are rated for 25 amp continuous discharge vs 15 for the Stark. The K2's also have a better temperature range.

In my opinion, the K2 is a superior product and is worth the extra cost.

I sell K2 batteries with the protection module for $150 US and chargers for $30 US and will have some on hand at the Seniors at Seminole Lake. For any one interested in purchasing a K2, contact me at the address below.

Dave Springford
dave at foxonecorp dot com


I don't believe anyone is building cells in North America for the consumer market. These are all coming from China. It makes no sense at all to build the BMS boards here either. So as a point of differentiation between vendors, there is nothing in it.
  #2  
Old February 4th 15, 05:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,383
Default K2 vs. StarkPower LiFePo4 batteries

On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 12:08:54 PM UTC-5, jfitch wrote:
On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 3:50:28 PM UTC-8, Dave Springford wrote:
I'll preface my remarks with the statement that I sell K2 batteries.

The K2's are made in the USA, not Chinese knock-offs. K2 pays a fee to the patent holder while the knock-off's do not. K2 has also had their batteries UL certified and listed.

These items account for some of the price difference.

The K2 also have a higher Watt-hour rating at 123 vs 115 for the Stark and the K2 are rated for 25 amp continuous discharge vs 15 for the Stark. The K2's also have a better temperature range.

In my opinion, the K2 is a superior product and is worth the extra cost.

I sell K2 batteries with the protection module for $150 US and chargers for $30 US and will have some on hand at the Seniors at Seminole Lake. For any one interested in purchasing a K2, contact me at the address below.

Dave Springford
dave at foxonecorp dot com


I don't believe anyone is building cells in North America for the consumer market. These are all coming from China. It makes no sense at all to build the BMS boards here either. So as a point of differentiation between vendors, there is nothing in it.


As an avid "Electric RC'er", while you are likely correct that most cells come from a limited number of places, where they end up can be a case of, "Give me cells" vs. "I don't want seconds/low performers".....
Price is not always a guarantee (there is a "very high priced" LiPO hobby vendor that has performance numbers similar to "mid level" vendors.....), but it can help out as well as "post sale support".

Not saying anything for/against any vendor mentioned here, just a different view.
  #3  
Old February 5th 15, 11:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Jim White[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 286
Default K2 vs. StarkPower LiFePo4 batteries

Reading the blurb referenced it would seem that the A123 batteries (which
are available from http://www.buya123batteries.com) seem to have the best
protection / charging electronics they only rated at 5Ah although this
should provide better performance than a 7Ah SLA.

The higher power batteries do not seem to have all the tricks in the
electronics.

Interesting note: although A123 is a US company using MIT derived
technology, they are owned by the Chinese!


At 17:37 04 February 2015, Charlie M. UH & 002 owner/pilot wrote:
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 12:08:54 PM UTC-5, jfitch wrote:
On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 3:50:28 PM UTC-8, Dave Springford

wrote:
I'll preface my remarks with the statement that I sell K2 batteries.

The K2's are made in the USA, not Chinese knock-offs. K2 pays a fee

to
the patent holder while the knock-off's do not. K2 has also had their
batteries UL certified and listed.

These items account for some of the price difference.

The K2 also have a higher Watt-hour rating at 123 vs 115 for the

Stark
and the K2 are rated for 25 amp continuous discharge vs 15 for the Stark.
The K2's also have a better temperature range.

In my opinion, the K2 is a superior product and is worth the extra

cost.

I sell K2 batteries with the protection module for $150 US and

chargers
for $30 US and will have some on hand at the Seniors at Seminole Lake.

For
any one interested in purchasing a K2, contact me at the address below.

Dave Springford
dave at foxonecorp dot com


I don't believe anyone is building cells in North America for the

consumer market. These are all coming from China. It makes no sense at

all
to build the BMS boards here either. So as a point of differentiation
between vendors, there is nothing in it.

As an avid "Electric RC'er", while you are likely correct that most cells
come from a limited number of places, where they end up can be a case of,
"Give me cells" vs. "I don't want seconds/low performers".....
Price is not always a guarantee (there is a "very high priced" LiPO hobby
vendor that has performance numbers similar to "mid level" vendors.....),
but it can help out as well as "post sale support".

Not saying anything for/against any vendor mentioned here, just a

different
view.


  #4  
Old February 5th 15, 01:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Ron Gleason
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 483
Default K2 vs. StarkPower LiFePo4 batteries

On Thursday, 5 February 2015 04:30:04 UTC-7, Jim White wrote:
Reading the blurb referenced it would seem that the A123 batteries (which
are available from http://www.buya123batteries.com) seem to have the best
protection / charging electronics they only rated at 5Ah although this
should provide better performance than a 7Ah SLA.

The higher power batteries do not seem to have all the tricks in the
electronics.

Interesting note: although A123 is a US company using MIT derived
technology, they are owned by the Chinese!


At 17:37 04 February 2015, Charlie M. UH & 002 owner/pilot wrote:
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 12:08:54 PM UTC-5, jfitch wrote:
On Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 3:50:28 PM UTC-8, Dave Springford

wrote:
I'll preface my remarks with the statement that I sell K2 batteries.

The K2's are made in the USA, not Chinese knock-offs. K2 pays a fee

to
the patent holder while the knock-off's do not. K2 has also had their
batteries UL certified and listed.

These items account for some of the price difference.

The K2 also have a higher Watt-hour rating at 123 vs 115 for the

Stark
and the K2 are rated for 25 amp continuous discharge vs 15 for the Stark.
The K2's also have a better temperature range.

In my opinion, the K2 is a superior product and is worth the extra

cost.

I sell K2 batteries with the protection module for $150 US and

chargers
for $30 US and will have some on hand at the Seniors at Seminole Lake.

For
any one interested in purchasing a K2, contact me at the address below.

Dave Springford
dave at foxonecorp dot com

I don't believe anyone is building cells in North America for the

consumer market. These are all coming from China. It makes no sense at

all
to build the BMS boards here either. So as a point of differentiation
between vendors, there is nothing in it.

As an avid "Electric RC'er", while you are likely correct that most cells
come from a limited number of places, where they end up can be a case of,
"Give me cells" vs. "I don't want seconds/low performers".....
Price is not always a guarantee (there is a "very high priced" LiPO hobby
vendor that has performance numbers similar to "mid level" vendors.....),
but it can help out as well as "post sale support".

Not saying anything for/against any vendor mentioned here, just a

different
view.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A123_Systems as you can read this company started out in Massachusetts and received US Government grants, went bankrupt and was bough by the Chinese.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LiFePO4 Batteries vontresc Soaring 56 June 27th 14 07:25 PM
Experience with StarkPower LIFEPo4 Batteries? Papa3[_2_] Soaring 15 May 7th 13 07:17 PM
LiFePO4 battery technolocy [email protected] Soaring 9 October 17th 12 10:05 PM
LiFePO4 batteries JS Soaring 26 October 15th 12 02:51 PM
LiFePO4 battery ASM Soaring 4 December 6th 11 07:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.