![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not sure who was saying that it had been tried and it didn't work
as several people of given examples of successful racing aircraft using surface radiators. Several famous Thompson Trophy (sea/float planes) winners used surface radiators to some degree. Most notably the Supermarines. Don't know what kind of problems they had, but its worth a look, and a grain of salt. The guy that was saying an airplane waiting in line is the same as a car idling in traffic is off base because even with zero airspeed that prop is blowing turbulent air across the cowl. The wing radiators aren't going to be as efficient per unit area as the cowl or other parts of the aircraft in turbulent flow. I was under the impression that Voyager used fuel efficient versions of the traditional aircooled engines commonly used today, so I'd like to hear more about the pickup truck stories. And just because something has been tried before and failed, doesn't mean the concept should be abandoned. Haven't you ever seen anyone flub an attempt or do an experiment with an agenda? Why should their oversight stop others from doing better. And those old times were lacking many of the tools available today, mainly the cheap availability of computing power. You have part time hacks doing analysis orders of magnitude more accurate than they were doing back the 20-30's. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|