![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 23 February 2015 17:53:17 UTC, pcool wrote:
I am afraid I posted to the wrong audience, because you dont even know that most of flarm units in europe do not have the capability to be reprogrammed with a memory card. You have to use a PC with a rs232 serial cable, to connect to the RJ45 plug of the Flarm unit. Most people do not even know what the heck this means. I fear these people that may fly around for weeks, or months, with a non-working flarm. The collision avoidance works on the principle of cooperation, as with Flarm here. If you dont have a working unit, my working unit will not work too. If I crash against a glider and the pilot says "my flarm did not say anything.." and we discover it was not updated, you bet your home, wife and kids that I shall sue the swiss company all the way. What they are doing is criminal. There are only two reasons why we dont have the firmware now, with a blackout pending in 45 days. A) Firmware is not yet ready and debugged. If this is the case, since we are talking of SAFETY, the best thing to do is to postpone by some months the entire matter. B) Firmware is ready, but flarm is dealing with its Tracking server and currently it is negotiating with the people of OGN and their network of receive stations round the world that will be soon obscured at the end of march. Yes, this is the missing point. Nothing to do with safety. But let's calm down please, no reason to argue.. wrote in message ... On Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 2:24:44 PM UTC-6, Mike Schumann wrote: On Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 12:36:15 PM UTC-5, Andy Blackburn wrote: Any device used for collision avoidance will have some of its critical capabilities dependent on both aircraft in a potential collision situation having the same algorithms on board or chaos (or worse) might ensue. Making the update mandatory and taking non-updated units out of service is the only way to ensure safe and reliable performance of the entire system. You might quibble a bit about the lead time, but updating the firmware is really not very complicated. I tried a different firmware version (or different config file) practically every day at the 15m nationals last year as I was trying to work out a PCAS problem and a interface issue with my LX 9000. All you need is the firmware and a memory stick. It's not that hard. It will all work out in the end. Remain calm. 9B It is NOT impossible to design system upgrades so that they are backward compatible with older units that are still in use. It is probably much more convenient for FLARM to use this approach so they don't need to deal with the complexity of having multiple different device versions that need to talk to each other. These kind of shortcuts make one question whether FLARM really has the potential to be a VERY niche product for a small subset of the aviation market. Couple that with POWERFLARM's inability to see UAT equipped ADS-B OUT equipped aircraft, either directly or via TIS-B retransmission from an ADS-B ground station, raises some big questions on whether or not they have really thought thru the whole collision avoidance picture in the US, where the threat is not just other gliders, but also GA and airline traffic. I wish the Messr. Schumann and Suppards would just join hands and walk away, far away from this forum. Maybe they can entertain each other with their nonsense. Anyone with a non-updated Flarm will be well aware that it is not working because there will be (unit-dependent) positive indications of the problem. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Colin Wray" wrote in message ... Anyone with a non-updated Flarm will be well aware that it is not working because there will be (unit-dependent) positive indications of the problem. Precisely! And those with updated Flarm will not know that the other are not working. Here's the song about the brave pilot with its updated and working Flarm, that cannot "see" the others. Where have all the gliders gone, long time passing? Where have all the gliders gone, long time ago? Where have all the Flarms gone?!? Need to update, every one! When will they ever learn, when will they ever learn? (Pete Seeger) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/25/2015 10:31 AM, John Galloway wrote:
You can still look out the window from time to time Exactly, FLARM is an aide if you NEED it you're doing it wrong... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 10:05:58 AM UTC-6, Luke Szczepaniak wrote:
On 02/25/2015 10:31 AM, John Galloway wrote: You can still look out the window from time to time Exactly, FLARM is an aide if you NEED it you're doing it wrong... Well, no, not always - more likely you NEED it if SOMEONE ELSE is doing it wrong! For example, someone entering you thermal where you can't see him, and not clearing his flight path so he hits you - you can do everything right and still be blindsided. Or, in the case of PowerFLARM, a powerplane blasting through your thermal or glider field airspace at pattern altitude. Sure are a lot of nice pretty screens to look at in modern planes, why look outside? And if there isn't 10,000ft of concrete and a control zone around it, there couldn't be an active airfield in that big grass field, after all.... Kirk 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flarm to MIO 400 | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | January 23rd 15 06:05 PM |
Flarm v5 | Kevin Neave[_2_] | Soaring | 5 | February 23rd 11 01:35 PM |
Flarm in the US | Steve Freeman | Soaring | 163 | August 15th 10 12:12 AM |
IGC FLARM DLL | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | March 25th 08 11:27 AM |
FLARM | John Galloway | Soaring | 9 | November 27th 04 07:16 AM |