![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only solution I can come up with is to use transformer coupling with three windings - two input windings from the two sources and one output winding to the speaker. The windings could all be on one toroid. The only coupling would be magnetic. I haven't had the energy to calculate what values might work, but offer it as a conceptual solution.
Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 2 March 2015 15:09:04 UTC+10, Mike the Strike wrote:
The only solution I can come up with is to use transformer coupling with three windings - two input windings from the two sources and one output winding to the speaker. The windings could all be on one toroid. The only coupling would be magnetic. I haven't had the energy to calculate what values might work, but offer it as a conceptual solution. Mike Interesting thought Mike, just wondering if the current in the windings of one output would not induce current in the other windings so you still would wind up ![]() I'll just go the conventional way for now ![]() Cheers Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not if it's a hybrid transformer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_coil I still would bet on sufficient independant speakers being the optimal solution. Second best is amplitude and impedance matching the vario output into the aux audio input of the radio (with the bonus, or drawback, that the vario output would be muted when receiving or transmitting. No Outputting an 8 knot climb audio signal to your struggling competitors) Peter At 05:38 02 March 2015, Paul B wrote: On Monday, 2 March 2015 15:09:04 UTC+10, Mike the Strike wrote: The only solution I can come up with is to use transformer coupling with = three windings - two input windings from the two sources and one output win= ding to the speaker. The windings could all be on one toroid. The only co= upling would be magnetic. I haven't had the energy to calculate what value= s might work, but offer it as a conceptual solution. =20 Mike Interesting thought Mike, just wondering if the current in the windings of = one output would not induce current in the other windings so you still woul= d wind up ![]() I'll just go the conventional way for now ![]() Cheers Paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 2 March 2015 21:00:06 UTC+10, pete purdie wrote:
Not if it's a hybrid transformer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_coil Thanks Pete, will check it out I still would bet on sufficient independant speakers being the optimal solution. So it would seem, but as I am up to four (radio,two electronic varios, one with two outputs), I thought that there must be a better way. Second best is amplitude and impedance matching the vario output into the aux audio input of the radio (with the bonus, or drawback, that the vario output would be muted when receiving or transmitting. No Outputting an 8 knot climb audio signal to your struggling competitors) I carry a special instrument for that ![]() Cheers Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vario and Radio on a common speaker? | Bastoune | Soaring | 9 | March 31st 13 05:43 PM |
Radio and Vario For Sale | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | January 13th 11 06:41 PM |
Common speaker for vario and radio | toad | Soaring | 15 | April 18th 05 04:50 AM |
Combining MEK with Plexiglass - good or bad? | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | June 24th 04 06:09 AM |
radio / vario interference - HELP! | Chris Davison | Soaring | 13 | November 3rd 03 06:09 AM |