![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only time I have ever disliked a tinted canopy was during a ridge soaring landout in the pouring rain.
Blue or green Mecaplex canopies are both nice. Depending on trim paint, blue might "look better" from the outside, but right now have a green vent window in a blue canopy and it's hard to tell the difference. Jim |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Something to keep in mind about tinted canopies. A tinted canopy (or sunglasses for that matter) result in less light reaching your eyes. Less light will result in lower visual acuity. I for one, want as sharp as possible vision when I fly.
From Wikipedia: 20/20 is normal (daylight) vision. In low light (i.e., scotopic) vision, spatial resolution is much lower. From personal experience, I use the least amount of tint on sunglasses to get the job done when I fly or drive. For other applications such as kicking around the beach where I have less need of sharp vision, I go with a much darker tint. Perhaps someone with the proper background could elaborate. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 20:30 09 March 2015, Craig Reinholt wrote:
Something to keep in mind about tinted canopies. A tinted canopy (or sunglasses for that matter) result in less light reaching your eyes. Less light will result in lower visual acuity. I for one, want as sharp as possible vision when I fly. From Wikipedia: 20/20 is normal (daylight) vision. In low light (i.e., scotopic) vision, spatial resolution is much lower. From personal experience, I use the least amount of tint on sunglasses to get the job done when I fly or drive. For other applications such as kicking around the beach where I have less need of sharp vision, I go with a much darker tint. Perhaps someone with the proper background could elaborate. Tinted canopies simply don't reduce light levels to anything like the extent required to reduce visual acuity in normal gliding daylight conditions. This is easy to prove in a 2 seater with a tinted canopy and comparing looking through the canopy versus looking through the open clear view panel. My syndicate partner and I did this in 2003 in a Duo with a blue tinted canopy and could find no difference in clarity of vision - in fact we found, against all logic and expectations, that in hazy conditions we thought we could see marginally better through the blue canopy than no canopy. We also tried various different coloured spectacle lenses to nail the then claim on RAS that brown spectacle lenses and a blue canopy would make it dark inside! It was complete nonsense of course. The subjectively perceived colour of the combination of the canopy and spectacle lenses was always entirely related to the colour of the much stronger spectacle tint rather than the canopy tint. The only situation in which the blue canopy was noticeable from inside the cockpit was in photographs from the cockpit which had a definite slight blue bias. I agree with Craig about not using an unnecessarily strong spectacle tint. I use Zeiss Skylet Fun which is quite bright and it is very comfortable inside my current green tinted canopy even in South African summer conditions. John Galloway |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tinted Canopy question | Soartech | Soaring | 1 | August 7th 13 01:36 PM |
Standard Oudi and smoke tinted canopy? | shkdriver | Soaring | 4 | July 23rd 12 12:25 PM |
Tinted canopies desirable? | Itsaplane[_2_] | Soaring | 15 | August 11th 09 01:45 PM |
Canopy... Clear Green or Blue ? | CH | Soaring | 8 | September 15th 03 02:14 PM |
Mecaplex and DG recommend tinted | John Galloway | Soaring | 0 | September 14th 03 03:50 PM |