![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're right, Steve! I was thinking of 1 antenna feeding two receivers.
Dan On 3/25/2015 9:55 AM, Steve Koerner wrote: On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 7:13:59 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote: ...And you don't mind the approximately 50% loss (3.5 dB) in signal It doesn't work that way Dan. With two antennas gathering energy from the same surroundings, the effect is primarily an alteration of pattern. The greater concern might be polarization. PowerFlarm is a vertical polarization system. I'm not exactly sure what TW means by "stripe antenna in the canopy (laterally & slightly behind my head)". That doesn't sound vertical polarized; hopefully I'm just not visualizing that correctly. -- Dan Marotta |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2014 SSA/US Tasking Analysis | Sean Fidler | Soaring | 68 | February 4th 15 06:21 PM |
Interesting analysis of US Soaring Team Results (1950-2014) | Sean Fidler | Soaring | 6 | January 31st 15 05:32 AM |
PowerFlarm: 2.7 Vertical Range | [email protected] | Soaring | 8 | April 9th 13 11:27 PM |
PowerFlarm Range Analysis | Richard[_9_] | Soaring | 0 | March 25th 13 04:43 PM |
PowerFLarm expected range | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | August 30th 12 03:43 PM |