US to attack Saudi Arabia? if not why not?

"Sammy" wrote in message
...
Can anyone in this newsgroup explain what is happening with the US
military in regard to fighting the war on terrorism - specifically I
would like to know why the USAF is not attacking Saudi Arabia as they
were the original breeding ground of Al Quadea ... were they not?

Gee, they got enough problems with Iraq. One war at a time if you don't
mind.

Osama originated from Saudi Arabia and so were many of the Sept 11 2001
hijackers. This is a issue many people especially American leaders have
rather curiously hidden from view since the Sept 11 attack happened.

Hidden? Not from what I've seen on TV and newspapers.


According to my information Osama has his resources in many countries
around the world at the moment still...... but rather unusual Saudi
Arabia is still not bombed and invaded by the US.

One war at a time, OK?

If the US cant attack Saudi Arabia, why did it then attack Afghanistan
and then furthermore Iraq?

Umm, because Osama and his network were working out of Afghanistan?

And Iraq? Saddam had it coming. Too bad we didn't do it in '91.

Does the US have some problem with invading Saudi Arabia and removing
the regime there?..

What specifically has the Saudi government done to the USA to be removed?

It has no quams on invading Afghanistan or Iraq.. so it must be
something else?

Well, a good enough reason would help. I note that you haven't yet
articulated one.

Maybe its the oil in Saudi .. oil doesnt change in the Middle East... I
could be wrong...

What, oil stops invasions? HINT: It didn't stop the Iraq war for a second.

In summing up I believe the "coalition of lies" policies have been
rather bizarre, confusing and downright wasteful use money that could of
been better spent elsewhere on education and health issues in their own
countries.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Like the money would actually be spent on education and
health! What planet are you from?

"Ragnar" wrote in message
...

"Sammy" wrote in message
...
Can anyone in this newsgroup explain what is happening with the US
military in regard to fighting the war on terrorism - specifically I
would like to know why the USAF is not attacking Saudi Arabia as they
were the original breeding ground of Al Quadea ... were they not?

Gee, they got enough problems with Iraq. One war at a time if you don't
mind.

Osama originated from Saudi Arabia and so were many of the Sept 11 2001
hijackers. This is a issue many people especially American leaders have
rather curiously hidden from view since the Sept 11 attack happened.

Hidden? Not from what I've seen on TV and newspapers.


According to my information Osama has his resources in many countries
around the world at the moment still...... but rather unusual Saudi
Arabia is still not bombed and invaded by the US.

One war at a time, OK?

If the US cant attack Saudi Arabia, why did it then attack Afghanistan
and then furthermore Iraq?

Umm, because Osama and his network were working out of Afghanistan?

And Iraq? Saddam had it coming. Too bad we didn't do it in '91.

Does the US have some problem with invading Saudi Arabia and removing
the regime there?..

What specifically has the Saudi government done to the USA to be removed?

It has no quams on invading Afghanistan or Iraq.. so it must be
something else?

Well, a good enough reason would help. I note that you haven't yet
articulated one.

Maybe its the oil in Saudi .. oil doesnt change in the Middle East... I
could be wrong...

What, oil stops invasions? HINT: It didn't stop the Iraq war for a second.

In summing up I believe the "coalition of lies" policies have been
rather bizarre, confusing and downright wasteful use money that could of
been better spent elsewhere on education and health issues in their own
countries.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!! Like the money would actually be spent on education and
health! What planet are you from?

You must have been trying to make some sort of point when you said "one war at a
time" twice in your response above. Why, then, are you defending our second war
(the one with Iraq) when the war on terrorism in Afghanistan is still ongoing
and unfinished and, even worse, no closer to being concluded than when we
started it? OBL is still apparently alive and on the loose, AQ is still
functioning in various places around the world, and the Talliban is not only not
vanquished, but has returned to Afghanistan and resumed control of some areas.
If that's the way to fight the war on terror, maybe we need to go back to school
and learn how to do it. it looks to me like we've lost our way.

George Z.

ou must have been trying to make some sort of point when you said "one war at
a
time" twice in your response above. Why, then, are you defending our second
war
(the one with Iraq) when the war on terrorism in Afghanistan is still ongoing

Spreading chaos maybe?

and unfinished and, even worse, no closer to being concluded than when we

Not worse even better according to the motto of groups and associations that
the most of our (and some other nations) governing elite belongs to: "Ordo Ab
Chao"

If you start thinking about the meaning of "Ordo Ab Chao" you can explain many
seemingly senseless and counter productive actions.

If that's the way to fight the war on terror, maybe we need to go back to
school
and learn how to do it. it looks to me like we've lost our way.

The governing "elite" is not interested in fighting terror or anything else
their only interest is the spreading chaos.

Christians must fight muslims,Christians must fight Jews,Jews must fight all of
them,CIA must fight with military,FBI must fight both of them.
In other words open ended conflicts must pop up everywhere in the world.
They simply think "the time has come".