A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

That TLAR doesn't look right



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 13th 15, 12:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
SoaringXCellence
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 385
Default That TLAR doesn't look right

OK, I think we have (at least) two different ideas being discussed here, attached to the 45 degree value.

If you look at the article (which I have) one 45 degree reference is to the angle from the base-turn corner looking back to the touch down point. This is a common reference for almost any rectangular pattern described in a myriad of training manuals. It works pretty well for locating the base turn position, provided that enough altitude remains to complete the pattern.

There is the second reference to 45 degrees, which places the glider above the touch down point at the same distance laterally. This is the point (pun intended) where I think we have a few differences of opinion, mainly due to differences in altitude on the downwind. A lower performance (also slower) glider can easily be at 600' lateral displacement and have time and altitude to make corrections on the base leg due to the slower speed.

A faster, higher L/D glider needs a lot more distance/time to dissipate energy and being 600' laterally abeam the touch down would create a significant challenge, both with the turns required to intercept final and the 45 degree base base turn reference.

The article covers the extended downwind as a function of glider performance and clearly explains the need for adjustment.

Having said all that, at our field both a higher and wider pattern is typically flown and I believe the reference angle abeam the touchdown point is often closer to the 30 degrees noted by others.

MB
  #2  
Old July 13th 15, 04:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13
Default That TLAR doesn't look right

On Sunday, July 12, 2015 at 5:31:27 PM UTC-6, SoaringXCellence wrote:

A faster, higher L/D glider needs a lot more distance/time to dissipate energy and being 600' laterally abeam the touch down would create a significant challenge, both with the turns required to intercept final and the 45 degree base base turn reference.



Not really. EASA CS-22 paragraph 22.75 under which most high performance gliders were certificated says:

"It must be shown that the sailplane has a glide
slope not flatter than one in seven at a speed of
1·3 Vso with air brakes extended at maximum weight."

So basically all JAR-22/CS-22 gliders have less than 7:1 L/D with the spoilers open.

I've done several 45 degree angle of depression approaches with an early model DUO and it worked out fine.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BRS chutes. Why doesn't everyone use them? 5Z Soaring 0 January 22nd 11 01:34 AM
It doesn't fly, BUT... Bart[_2_] Home Built 8 June 20th 07 10:52 PM
TLAR help Slick Soaring 8 May 20th 06 12:56 AM
FAA doesn't know FBOs. Kyler Laird General Aviation 3 February 5th 04 04:06 PM
Doesn't GOOGLE...? Michael Horowitz Home Built 5 December 17th 03 05:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.