![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2015 00:23:33 UTC+2 schrieb Jonathan St. Cloud:
I have heard for John Neel that a 20 with winglets is very close in performance to the next generation aircraft. This sure is a pretty 20. I love the wood panel. Well, I flew an ASW20 with winglets for about 400h, and it's still lightyears from the next generation aircraft (which would be an ASW27). Bert Ventus cM TW |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
keskiviikko 23. syyskuuta 2015 10.06.31 UTC+3 Tango Whisky kirjoitti:
Well, I flew an ASW20 with winglets for about 400h, and it's still lightyears from the next generation aircraft (which would be an ASW27). Bert Ventus cM TW Not lightyears, but maybe few lightdays. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 2:50:44 PM UTC-4, Sean Fidler wrote:
My glider is earning its "frog" this winter ;-). 10%? Ill take 1%! ;-) My frog is only honorary, for helping Dave with a repair. I'm sure your glider will go faster with its new frog ;-) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 3:06:31 AM UTC-4, Tango Whisky wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2015 00:23:33 UTC+2 schrieb Jonathan St. Cloud: I have heard for John Neel that a 20 with winglets is very close in performance to the next generation aircraft. This sure is a pretty 20. I love the wood panel. Well, I flew an ASW20 with winglets for about 400h, and it's still lightyears from the next generation aircraft (which would be an ASW27). Bert Ventus cM TW I disagree ![]() i've flown a 27 and i don't prefer it over a 20. a 20 with winglets feels just as nice as to me. i do prefer a ventus 2bx though, in terms of handling. it handles extremely nicely. but for cockpit comfort the 20 is better in my opinion. i flew a discus for a long time, and then started flying a 20. got back in the discus once and was sore after about 2 hours. -andy |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I flew a Discus once and my back hurt for days. I swapped my LS-6 once
with a friend for his '20 and neither one of us was very happy. He thought the '6 was twitchy and I thought the '20 was heavy. Diff'rent strokes... On 9/23/2015 7:23 AM, ND wrote: On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 3:06:31 AM UTC-4, Tango Whisky wrote: Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2015 00:23:33 UTC+2 schrieb Jonathan St. Cloud: I have heard for John Neel that a 20 with winglets is very close in performance to the next generation aircraft. This sure is a pretty 20. I love the wood panel. Well, I flew an ASW20 with winglets for about 400h, and it's still lightyears from the next generation aircraft (which would be an ASW27). Bert Ventus cM TW I disagree ![]() i've flown a 27 and i don't prefer it over a 20. a 20 with winglets feels just as nice as to me. i do prefer a ventus 2bx though, in terms of handling. it handles extremely nicely. but for cockpit comfort the 20 is better in my opinion. i flew a discus for a long time, and then started flying a 20. got back in the discus once and was sore after about 2 hours. -andy -- Dan, 5J |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 9:23:31 AM UTC-4, ND wrote:
On Wednesday, September 23, 2015 at 3:06:31 AM UTC-4, Tango Whisky wrote: Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2015 00:23:33 UTC+2 schrieb Jonathan St. Cloud: I have heard for John Neel that a 20 with winglets is very close in performance to the next generation aircraft. This sure is a pretty 20. I love the wood panel. Well, I flew an ASW20 with winglets for about 400h, and it's still lightyears from the next generation aircraft (which would be an ASW27). Bert Ventus cM TW I disagree ![]() i've flown a 27 and i don't prefer it over a 20. a 20 with winglets feels just as nice as to me. i do prefer a ventus 2bx though, in terms of handling. it handles extremely nicely. but for cockpit comfort the 20 is better in my opinion. i flew a discus for a long time, and then started flying a 20. got back in the discus once and was sore after about 2 hours. -andy What the 27 does better than the 20 is climb well in chopped up thermals. What it does *really* well is the same with a load of water. Given round thermals, a determined 20 driver can do very well against modern carbon and even win now and then, especially if there is ridge running involved. Integrate over the course of a long contest, and the odds accumulate against the 20. Evan Ludeman / T8 (ASW-20B) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i've flown a 27 and i don't prefer it over a 20. a 20 with winglets feels just as nice as to me.
Been on both sides of that equation! We have good days and bad days and that performance difference can be much more than the number after the W. Good winglets do make slow flight a lot nicer. Similar colored handles were mentioned. Discovered a while ago that in Australia the factory black spoiler handle, or in this case the cool wooden handles wouldn't pass a "Form 2" (Annual). ....Unless you can distract the inspector with the flying frog. Jim |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doesn't the light colored panel create a lot of glare in the canopy? That's why all the instruments are always black.
Boggs |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Omega Seamaster Men's Planet Ocean 2909.50.91 - Cheapest Watch | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | April 30th 08 03:48 PM |
Coolest cat on the planet | Ron | Aviation Photos | 1 | February 17th 08 05:08 PM |
How to fly on planet Mars ??? | Tristan Beeline | Aerobatics | 0 | June 14th 05 10:50 AM |
Small Blue Planet Toys goes Postal !! Economy Shipping Options now availalble | Small Blue Planet Toys | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 11th 03 04:00 PM |
HUGE Summer SALE + Free Shipping @ Small Blue Planet Toys | Small Blue Planet Toys | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 8th 03 11:53 PM |