General Zinni on Sixty Minutes

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

They supposedly only did "research" on binary sarin rounds, and that
*after* 1991.


Well, Mr. Adam says they had a "fair amount pre-1991 and had since
destroyed almost all of it". At least one of you is wrong.

In article et,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

They supposedly only did "research" on binary sarin rounds, and that
*after* 1991.

Well, Mr. Adam says they had a "fair amount pre-1991 and had since
destroyed almost all of it". At least one of you is wrong.

The "wrong" person is the one who doesn't know there are different kinds
of "binary" rounds (i.e., you).

They had "binary sarin," which was pre-mixed and poured into the shell
immediately before firing, and which led to a high number of accidental
exposures by gun crews. They did *not* have a binary shell that mixed
in flight, like the one found recently (according to the reports they
made to the UN).

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

The "wrong" person is the one who doesn't know there are different kinds
of "binary" rounds (i.e., you).


Hmmm..., how can I be wrong about something I did not comment on?

In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

In article et,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

They supposedly only did "research" on binary sarin rounds, and that
*after* 1991.

Well, Mr. Adam says they had a "fair amount pre-1991 and had since
destroyed almost all of it". At least one of you is wrong.

The "wrong" person is the one who doesn't know there are different kinds
of "binary" rounds (i.e., you).

Hmmm..., how can I be wrong about something I did not comment on?

Original comments restored to show just how dishonest you are.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

Original comments restored to show just how dishonest you are.


Actually, that's a quote of Mr. Adams' comment.

In article . net,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

Original comments restored to show just how dishonest you are.

Actually, that's a quote of Mr. Adams' comment.

....and since you quoted it, you commented on it.

That's two low-quality lies in a row.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

...and since you quoted it, you commented on it.

That's two low-quality lies in a row.


com·ment Pronunciation Key (kmnt)
n.
1..
1.. A written note intended as an explanation, illustration, or
criticism of a passage in a book or other writing; an annotation.
2.. A series of annotations or explanations.
2..
1.. A statement of fact or opinion, especially a remark that expresses a
personal reaction or attitude.
2.. An implied conclusion or judgment: a novel that is a comment on
contemporary lawlessness.
3.. Talk; gossip: a divorce that caused much comment.
4.. Computer Science. A string of text in a program that does not function
in the program itself but is used by the programmer to explain instructions.
5.. Linguistics. The part of a sentence that provides new information
about the topic. Also called rheme.

v. com·ment·ed, com·ment·ing, com·ments
v. intr.
1.. To make a comment; remark.
2.. To serve as a judgmental commentary: "Her demise comments on [the
Upper East Side's] entire way of life" (Mark Muro).

In article , Chad Irby
wrote:

In article et,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
om...

They supposedly only did "research" on binary sarin rounds, and that
*after* 1991.

Well, Mr. Adam says they had a "fair amount pre-1991 and had since
destroyed almost all of it". At least one of you is wrong.

The "wrong" person is the one who doesn't know there are different kinds
of "binary" rounds (i.e., you).

They had "binary sarin," which was pre-mixed and poured into the shell
immediately before firing, and which led to a high number of accidental
exposures by gun crews. They did *not* have a binary shell that mixed
in flight, like the one found recently (according to the reports they
made to the UN).

Not precisely. They had the field-mixed binary operational. Item 36 of
the UNSCOM report identifies an R&D program on true in-flight mixing
binary. Presumably, some actual shells were made as part of the R&D.