![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, 9 December 2015 15:46:55 UTC+2, Casey Cox wrote:
I figured that but seeing someone else actually state it helps. The other advantage you missed is Self Launch. I did not realize that Vne limitation became a problem. (Haven't got there yet). I didn't miss the self launch option as one can already purchase self launch gliders new or second hand so there is no particular advantage to a 13.5m self launcher. If I'm not mistaken there is a self-launch option for the LAK 17B FES so FES self-launch is possible on longer wingspan gliders too even if it's not that popular yet. It comes down to cost vs performance and if I had the choice I'd rather spend the money on a second hand, 18m, petrol powered self launcher than on a new 13.5m FES glider simply due to bang-for-buck. But then again I'm one of those types who doesn't replace my vehicle every three years and couldn't care about driving the latest and greatest. I'm sure the 13.5m gliders are plenty of fun to fly. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes 13.5 gliders are great fun, especially for the recreational pilot.
But the problems with longer span gliders here in Europe are the restrictions imposed by EASA on certified aircraft. With UL, flying costs are lower too - no aerotows, self maintenance, smaller batteries for electric power etc. etc. Used new-design 18m self-launchers are still way more expensive than 13.5m gliders. If cost is not an issue then just wait 3 years for the latest super-yacht! At 05:40 10 December 2015, Surge wrote: On Wednesday, 9 December 2015 15:46:55 UTC+2, Casey Cox wrote: I figured that but seeing someone else actually state it helps. The othe= r advantage you missed is Self Launch. I did not realize that Vne limitati= on became a problem. (Haven't got there yet). I didn't miss the self launch option as one can already purchase self launc= h gliders new or second hand so there is no particular advantage to a 13.5m= self launcher. If I'm not mistaken there is a self-launch option for the LAK 17B FES so FE= S self-launch is possible on longer wingspan gliders too even if it's not t= hat popular yet. It comes down to cost vs performance and if I had the choice I'd rather spe= nd the money on a second hand, 18m, petrol powered self launcher than on a = new 13.5m FES glider simply due to bang-for-buck. But then again I'm one of= those types who doesn't replace my vehicle every three years and couldn't = care about driving the latest and greatest. I'm sure the 13.5m gliders are = plenty of fun to fly. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another advantage to the 13.5 meter gliders like the Silent is that when fitted with an FES system they are not just sustainers but self-launchers. Hence the Silent Electro is a real self-launcher. No more waiting for a $50 tow.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Would you rather fly a Sailplane? | Karen | Soaring | 18 | June 7th 12 02:28 AM |
Best Looking Sailplane | glider[_2_] | Soaring | 52 | November 23rd 09 04:29 PM |
Could this be used in a sailplane? | Spam | Soaring | 6 | July 5th 09 08:16 PM |
Another Sailplane | Ben Jeffrey | Aviation Photos | 2 | June 24th 08 08:11 PM |
Sailplane Upholstery | Gadget Guy | Soaring | 3 | February 15th 06 09:54 PM |