A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Glider Racing in the future



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 11th 16, 12:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,383
Default Glider Racing in the future

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 6:38:36 PM UTC-5, BobW wrote:
On 2/10/2016 3:08 PM, Dan Marotta wrote:
Why must someone either purchase and install the latest technology or...
be a technophobe?

I can assure you that I've been involved with developing and operating some
of the highest technologies, things that you can't even imagine but, if I
don't want to install some technology that you think is the cat's meow, I'm
a technophobe.

There is some middle ground after all. Some call it "diff'rent strokes".

snip The SSA convention would be a good place for technophobes to learn
how to embrace new soaring technology. Jim


-- Dan, 5J


Dan, you contentious, technophobic, piece of moose...no, wait!!! Once you get
used to "the new normal" ascendant with much of humanity being continuously
on-line, and compulsively texting to the point of having no time for nuanced
communications, you'll be just fine. Embrace your new reality!

Bob - happily cell-phone-less - W.


While I would normally NOT reply to this....... I'm sorta, "On the fence". I will assume (yes, I know the acronym of this), this post was a bit of, "Tongue in check?".

BTW, have a great day.
  #22  
Old February 11th 16, 12:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default Glider Racing in the future

:-D

On 2/10/2016 4:38 PM, BobW wrote:
On 2/10/2016 3:08 PM, Dan Marotta wrote:
Why must someone either purchase and install the latest technology or...
be a technophobe?

I can assure you that I've been involved with developing and
operating some
of the highest technologies, things that you can't even imagine but,
if I
don't want to install some technology that you think is the cat's
meow, I'm
a technophobe.

There is some middle ground after all. Some call it "diff'rent
strokes".

snip The SSA convention would be a good place for technophobes to
learn
how to embrace new soaring technology. Jim


-- Dan, 5J


Dan, you contentious, technophobic, piece of moose...no, wait!!! Once
you get used to "the new normal" ascendant with much of humanity being
continuously on-line, and compulsively texting to the point of having
no time for nuanced communications, you'll be just fine. Embrace your
new reality!

Bob - happily cell-phone-less - W.


--
Dan, 5J

  #23  
Old February 11th 16, 02:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,384
Default Glider Racing in the future

Thought I'd included myself on the technophobe list with the early GPS bit!
Perhaps there are degrees of phobia?
Most of us overcame the fear of using GPS, transponder or a pee tube.
Some people refuse to try Vietnamese soup.
Jim
  #24  
Old February 11th 16, 03:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
smfidler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 72
Default Glider Racing in the future

Yeah, yeah. I know. I just didnt want to mess too much, to fast with our only real useful anti-collision tool. ;-)

Let them (Flarm, IGC, etc) figure out a new reduced info mode that works well, is safe, etc and then we will support it...if ADSB isnt too close to being a requirement in gliders by then...

What some feel about technology may simply not be possible to ban (FAA regulations) in a very short time...

Sean

On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 8:30:19 PM UTC-5, John Godfrey (QT) wrote:
On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 2:42:54 PM UTC-5, SF wrote:
TOPIC: "Racing in the Futu Should We Moderate the Impact of Technology?"

John Godfrey (QT) began competing in gliders in 1984. He was elected to the US Competition Rules Committee in 2008 and has chaired the committee since 2013. In addition he has served as Competition Director for National championships, Scorer for both International and US contests, and US Team Captain for the 2006 WGC.

John's key interest is in increasing participation by making/keeping racing fun and affordable for people like him (i.e., those unlikely to win a National). In addition to presenting a road map for coming technologies and their possible impact, he looks forward to thoughtful and lively interactions with the audience on these issues.

Thursday Feb. 18, 2016 2:30 - 3:15 PM
SSA Convention Greenville SC
www.ssaconvention.org

Flarm on, you flarming Flarmers
SF


https://groups.google.com/forum/#!se...M/DbF55dhoEQAJ

  #25  
Old February 11th 16, 04:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Charlie M. (UH & 002 owner/pilot)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,383
Default Glider Racing in the future

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 9:45:28 PM UTC-5, JS wrote:
Thought I'd included myself on the technophobe list with the early GPS bit!
Perhaps there are degrees of phobia?
Most of us overcame the fear of using GPS, transponder or a pee tube.
Some people refuse to try Vietnamese soup.
Jim


Pee tube?!?!...... I still use quart sized zip-lock baggies! Sheesh, I guess I'm behind the times.....
  #26  
Old February 11th 16, 03:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default Glider Racing in the future



On 2/10/2016 7:45 PM, JS wrote:
Thought I'd included myself on the technophobe list with the early GPS bit!
Perhaps there are degrees of phobia?
Most of us overcame the fear of using GPS, transponder or a pee tube.
Some people refuse to try Vietnamese soup.
Jim


Or menudo or haggis or Rocky Mountain oysters...

--
Dan, 5J

  #27  
Old February 12th 16, 01:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
SF
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 214
Default Glider Racing in the future

You know a topic about the future has gone off track when Vietnamese soup is mentioned.

We are addicted to technology. Not just in gliding, but in everyday life. I foresee of no conceivable way to ban it from a sport begging for more participation. The PW-5 was an attempt at limiting technology, in a trade off for affordability, that didn't turn out so well. Or is that something else I got wrong? Pretty soon I'll be banned from talking about the future, in addition to Schempp Hirth.

Bob W, dude, next time I'm working up a performance review for our sales manager, you are the first guy I gonna call.

Oh and the guy that is going to race the 1-26, those things are a blast in a one design race, just get your self a cell phone first, makes calling the retrieve desk easier.



SF
  #28  
Old February 12th 16, 11:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
WB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 236
Default Glider Racing in the future

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 8:10:30 AM UTC-6, Dave Springford wrote:
Soaring of the future is here - a completely autonomous RC glider has flown a 113.4 km (70.47 mi) open distance. It has also unofficially broken the cross-country soaring out-and-return world record by flying 97.2 km (60.4 mi) declared distance over approximately 4.55 hr.

All the details are in the paper from the US Naval Research Lab that you may read he

http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA614555


I would rather we not allow soaring autopilots in the cockpits of racing sailplanes. Guess that makes me a Luddite.
  #29  
Old February 13th 16, 11:24 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default Glider Racing in the future

On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 15:45:53 -0800, WB wrote:


I would rather we not allow soaring autopilots in the cockpits of racing
sailplanes. Guess that makes me a Luddite.

I suppose that depends on what the competition is trying to measu if
its pilot skill or the performance of a particular airframe+pilot, then
you're absolutely right.

However, if the competition is purely to pick the best glider, then
something like the scenario on Arthur C Clark's "The Wind From The Sun"
is more appropriate: the pilot handles takeoff and tow before bailing out
at the start line, leaving the autopilot to do the business.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
  #30  
Old February 13th 16, 11:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 351
Default Glider Racing in the future

A cell phone for the retreave desk? Hell ive got them on speed dial when flying the 1-26 but i just wish karl would get the handicapping right, if so my little spam can would be creaming you glass boys or if they adopt that new handicapped task like they are experimenting with up in truckie, the glass boys will be the ones needing the speed dial! Lol
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Outstanding video on the sport of Glider RACING Sean Fidler Soaring 22 January 22nd 15 06:45 PM
Basic glider racing presentation? [email protected] Soaring 4 October 25th 12 12:27 AM
Past Results/Future Performance Redux (Another weekend, another 2U.S. glider incidents...) BobW Soaring 0 February 6th 12 06:58 PM
Art of Racing, concluded - Langelle - Glen Martin Racing.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman[_4_] Aviation Photos 0 February 28th 10 08:22 PM
Glider Racing on aopa.org and Let's Go Flying [email protected][_2_] Soaring 2 April 4th 09 05:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.