![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Medicare and SS have not been "found" to be anything, Ed.
Or do you have cite for a ruling we are unaware of? Also- don't put up strawmen. There is a difference between "un" constitutional and "extra" consitutional. I for one am not claiming that the current social safety net is unconstituional. Only the supremes can make that call. [Note: it could be argued- and it is a reasonable argument at that- that the SCOTUS do not have the power to declare anything "Constitutional;" only "Unconstitutional."] I am claiming that the vast majority of the social safety net is extraconstitutional, however. And as to the claims (repeated by you) about "the consent of the governed" and all of that- there are plenty of rational, well-educated and reasonable people in this country who are keeping their powder dry. Literally. Steve Swartz "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 15:21:58 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message .. . That's absurd. We agree beforehand in our republic that once a decision is made through the legislative process, we will abide by that decision or seek to change it through the established judicial process. We don't get to pick and choose which laws we will comply with or which government programs we will allow our taxes to support. But we didn't agree to these programs beforehand! There is no Constitutional basis for them. The proper legislative process was not followed. If the government can pick and choose which Constitutional provisions it will adhere to and which it will ignore why can't the citizenry pick and choose which laws it will follow? Excuse me? Social Security and Medicare are not the result of an act of Congress? There were no elections for those representatives? There was no public debate? There have been no subsequent modifications to the program at the behest of interest groups, concerned citizens, etc? Where then did these programs come from? How were they authorized? Who runs them? Government chooses policies after debate and public input to solve the needs of the nation. The Constitutionality is determined by established rules but only after the fact of legislative or executive action. Seems as though Medicare and SS have not been found unconstitutional. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 04 11:55 AM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
Highest-Ranking Black Air Force General Credits Success to Hard Work | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 10th 04 11:06 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |