![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Juan,
I give up..... You ask for "proof" for some inconsequential matter.... and that proof, or lack of response to the request, is to you the full measure of the man. And you Juan? What is your measure? Would you prefer to be measured as a person, who, at least on the internet (including ANN), called himself a journalist, but failed to adhere to the ethics we expect from a journalist? Is your persona here your full measure? Your military service? And what of your occasional employer, Mr. Campbell? What are his verifiable bona fides? What is his measure? I suspect that the answer to the question about yourself would be much different than what you seem to expect from Chuck and all those who detest Mr. Campbell. You decide what you wish to be remembered for. Red "Juan..E..Jimenez" b*d&5^@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m wrote in message news:kXuyb.374171$Fm2.375513@attbi_s04... Wishful thinking. Still waiting for the Chukster to show proof to go along with his big mouth. Until then there's very little of interest in the newsgroup. Oh, and the BBQ is ready for the ducks. But since we know that the Chukster is about nothing but hot air... ![]() "red12049" wrote in message ... Find it interesting that Juan has gone missing from here for weeks now.... Thought maybe my "Journalists' Credo" message had something to do with it, but probably its' your ducks.... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "red12049" wrote in message ... Juan, I give up..... You ask for "proof" for some inconsequential matter.... Let me make this crystal clear for you, whomever you happen to be. I don't care what you think is or is not inconsequential, or what your overactive imagination churns up as a very, very lame comeback. Nor do I care what you think is the measure of anyone, let alone me. You think the whining little children who make up the RAH Gaggle are of any consequence? You think what they think of me, or of Jim Campbell, or of anyone else, is of any consequence? On what reality? Better yet, on what planet? chuckle What really gets the gaggle is that no matter how hard they try, ANN continues to grow and grow and grow... and become more and more and more successful. That makes the gaggle furious, and they stomp their feet, and they whine like stuck pigs, and they scream like little monkeys... ....and nothing they do, or will do, or can do, works. In the end, whom do you think will be remembered, period? The whining boys of the gaggle? Or the people who work so hard to bring so much information and news to the aviation world? I'll give you one guess. Got it? Good! Have a nice day. ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article qZwyb.268461$275.961167@attbi_s53, b*d&5^@-*bd5+.!c#o$m
says... snipped usual garbage What really gets the gaggle is that no matter how hard they try, ANN continues to grow and grow and grow... and become more and more and mo re successful. Does that mean that Mooz can finally pay off the judgement that his old lawyer has? Maybe he can now pay for articles in the rag? Sure would be better than just reprinting crap off the news wire or filling up space with TFR reprints. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(sleepy6) writes: What really gets the gaggle is that no matter how hard they try, ANN continues to grow and grow and grow... and become more and more and mo re successful. Does that mean that Mooz can finally pay off the judgement that his old lawyer has? Maybe he can now pay for articles in the rag? Sure would be better than just reprinting crap off the news wire or filling up space with TFR reprints. I wonder if the IRS knows how successful he has become and that he can now pay all those back taxes he owes. Maybe they should be told along with all his creditors who were never paid. How about all the subscribers to the USAviator who never got their refunds or magazines? Bob Reed www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site) KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress.... "Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice, pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!" (M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Juan,
Funny you should say what you did..... Indirectly, ANN is why I am here. You are right... we don't amount to anything in anyones life but those we touch directly. and you are right again... ANN WILL be remembered.....unfortunately probably not in the way you seem to indicate..... I ended up reading RAH because, after reading ANN for awhile, I came to the conclusion that it violated everything I knew about good journalism, and I decided to do a little background reading about its' writers. I never had the pleasure of knowing Tony Pucillo, but in my research I found a post he made back in the mid nineties about why ANN could never work (I believe back then it was Jims' print magazine), no matter WHO was running it, let alone soneone with Mr. Campbells' problems. Tony was right then, and still is. You are right Juan, it doesn't matter what we think. It will matter what YOU ultimately think, and those close to and important to you. You figure out what you would like. Red "Juan..E..Jimenez" b*d&5^@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m wrote in message news:qZwyb.268461$275.961167@attbi_s53... "red12049" wrote in message ... Juan, I give up..... You ask for "proof" for some inconsequential matter.... Let me make this crystal clear for you, whomever you happen to be. I don't care what you think is or is not inconsequential, or what your overactive imagination churns up as a very, very lame comeback. Nor do I care what you think is the measure of anyone, let alone me. You think the whining little children who make up the RAH Gaggle are of any consequence? You think what they think of me, or of Jim Campbell, or of anyone else, is of any consequence? On what reality? Better yet, on what planet? chuckle What really gets the gaggle is that no matter how hard they try, ANN continues to grow and grow and grow... and become more and more and more successful. That makes the gaggle furious, and they stomp their feet, and they whine like stuck pigs, and they scream like little monkeys... ...and nothing they do, or will do, or can do, works. In the end, whom do you think will be remembered, period? The whining boys of the gaggle? Or the people who work so hard to bring so much information and news to the aviation world? I'll give you one guess. Got it? Good! Have a nice day. ![]() --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Juan..E..Jimenez" b*d&5^@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m
Juan, I give up..... You ask for "proof" for some inconsequential matter.... Let me make this crystal clear for you, whomever you happen to be. I don't care what you think is or is not inconsequential, or what your overactive imagination churns up as a very, very lame comeback. Nor do I care what you think is the measure of anyone, let alone me. You think the whining little children who make up the RAH Gaggle are of any consequence? You think what they think of me, or of Jim Campbell, or of anyone else, is of any consequence? On what reality? Better yet, on what planet? chuckle What really gets the gaggle is that no matter how hard they try, ANN continues to grow and grow and grow... and become more and more and more successful. Etc..etc..etc. Juan, you pressed for proof about Chuck's truck for some reason I will never understand. You demand all kinds of information from him, yet refuse to provide the equivillent when asked in return. Personally I couldn't care less about ANN or any other magazine. You are a bully, and like any other bully, you are a coward who incapable of admitting fault. You are also incapable of trying to find a middle ground. I have learned all this by watching your ungentlemanly behaviour in this NG.I have seen zero integrity on your part. You have made no attempt at adult debate. If, as Chuck and others have contended, you wind up getting slammed in court you will have no one to blame but yourself. Would I say all this to your face? Come on over and find out. Have you flown your BD-5 yet or moved to PR as you gave as a reason for selling it? Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B2431" wrote in message ... Juan, you pressed for proof about Chuck's truck for some reason I will never understand. You demand all kinds of information from him, yet refuse to provide the equivillent when asked in return. Don't blame me for not following the thread to its beginning. The Duckboy got stomped because he decided to stick his foot in his mouth and poke the wrong person. I don't have to provide anything for him, because I don't need to prove anything to him. remainder of BS snipped |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Juan,
If I've read the correct thread, Chuck referred to you as "Zoom's toady, Jaun". Could that be construed as a personal attack? Sure. But Chucks' claim to fame is as an aircraft manufacturer, nothing else. He hasn't, to the best of my knowledge, claimed to be anyone or anything else. You on the other hand, claim to be a journalist. As a journalist, you are automatically held to a higher standard, in ANY forum. Preamble Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society's principles and standards of practice. I'd repost the whole thing, but you've already seen it. If you are not acting in this manner, then you've already lost, even if you win this small battle. Worse, you are helping your opponent win, and demeaning the term "journalist" in everyones' eyes (and not just in RAH). This is a part of what I was asking you about how you wanted to be remembered, and the measure of a man. Red "Juan..E.-Jimenez" b*d&5^-@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m wrote in message news:Y7Wyb.276876$9E1.1459437@attbi_s52... "B2431" wrote in message ... Juan, you pressed for proof about Chuck's truck for some reason I will never understand. You demand all kinds of information from him, yet refuse to provide the equivillent when asked in return. Don't blame me for not following the thread to its beginning. The Duckboy got stomped because he decided to stick his foot in his mouth and poke the wrong person. I don't have to provide anything for him, because I don't need to prove anything to him. remainder of BS snipped --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , red12049 says...
Juan, If I've read the correct thread, Chuck referred to you as "Zoom's toady, Jaun". Could that be construed as a personal attack? Sure. But more importantly what I said was "true" not a vague accusation or innuendo or a generality. What you say about Journalism is true and jaun fails the test as a journalist.He hinted in previous posts that I had children in the juvenile justice system ,that I was hiding things and didn't own a vehicle with my name on the title. None of it true but all designed to damage me and my reputation.Just because I called him "zoom's toady" he feels he has the right to insult me and my children personally. I could have gone to the gutter with him and asked for proof of a lot of things but didn't. But Chucks' claim to fame is as an aircraft manufacturer, nothing else. He hasn't, to the best of my knowledge, claimed to be anyone or anything else. That's correct ,if I said I designed the Hawk I can prove it,if I said I had a patent I can prove it ,same for Junk Yard Wars ,Hall of Fame and my other accomplishments. From what I can see jaun hasn't finished anything ,test flown anything or done anything worthy of note, the same for as his hero zoom .Yet both of those guys feel that they have some right to judge the works of others. Boy what a case of inflated egos. Problem is they believe their own hype and think we do too...NOT!! You on the other hand, claim to be a journalist. As a journalist, you are automatically held to a higher standard, in ANY forum. jaun can't fill a journalist's shoes he lacks the credentials and integrity. Nuff said.. See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret "envy it seems to be about envy" chuck s |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , red12049 says...
Juan, I give up..... You ask for "proof" for some inconsequential matter.... and that proof, or lack of response to the request, is to you the full measure of the man. Hi Red The proof jaun wanted to see was proof that I owned my vehicles that I took/will take to Sun n Fun. Here's the post I made on 11/12/03 showing my truck registrations with my name on them. See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Title: jaun is a liar/ truck titlesJJJJJJ Author: ChuckSlusarczyk Date: 12 Nov 2003 21:18:17 -0800 I gave jaun enough rope to make a fool of himself .So just for the record you can go to the following sites and see copies of my registrations for my 97 ,00 and 03 Dodge Ram trucks, all with my name listed as the owner. Everyone knows that you can't get plates and registrations without titles. I did this just to show that I have nothing to hide and jaun has no credibility. http://www.wanttaja.com/chuck97.JPG http://www.wanttaja.com/chuck00.JPG http://www.wanttaja.com/chuck03.JPG Case closed slam dunk. See ya Chuck S RAH-15/1 ret "credibility it was always about credibility" chuck s And you Juan? What is your measure? Would you prefer to be measured as a person, who, at least on the internet (including ANN), called himself a journalist, but failed to adhere to the ethics we expect from a journalist? Is your persona here your full measure? Your military service? And what of your occasional employer, Mr. Campbell? What are his verifiable bona fides? What is his measure? I suspect that the answer to the question about yourself would be much different than what you seem to expect from Chuck and all those who detest Mr. Campbell. You decide what you wish to be remembered for. Red "Juan..E..Jimenez" b*d&5^@-*b(d)5+.!c#o$m wrote in message news:kXuyb.374171$Fm2.375513@attbi_s04... Wishful thinking. Still waiting for the Chukster to show proof to go along with his big mouth. Until then there's very little of interest in the newsgroup. Oh, and the BBQ is ready for the ducks. But since we know that the Chukster is about nothing but hot air... ![]() "red12049" wrote in message ... Find it interesting that Juan has gone missing from here for weeks now.... Thought maybe my "Journalists' Credo" message had something to do with it, but probably its' your ducks.... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|