A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ADS-B Compliance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 3rd 16, 07:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default ADS-B Compliance

snip?

On 3/2/2016 8:43 PM, 2G wrote:
The good news is you can get your info straight from the FAA:http://www.icao.int/APAC/Meetings/20...20briefing.pdf

\snip

I was just talking with my local FSDO and he laughed and told me that,
during his training in Oklahoma city, he was welcomed to the FAA where
they have 93 independently operated offices! Yes, they're all supposed
to operate under the same rules (the FARs) but they sometimes interpret
them differently. For example, when I received my Air Force training in
the Rockwell Sabreliner, the FSDO in the region where I took the
training considered the aircraft to be a center-line thrust aircraft.
So I deferred getting a type rating in the aircraft until I returned to
my duty station in a different region where the aircraft was NOT
considered to be a center-line thrust aircraft. Voila! I received an
unrestricted Airplane Multi-engine Land rating with a type rating for
the aircraft. Same rules, different interpretation.

I'm gonna wait until the ADS-B requirements are better defined before
buying any equipment.
--
Dan, 5J

  #2  
Old March 4th 16, 04:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
David Kinsell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 70
Default ADS-B Compliance

On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:32:17 -0700, Dan Marotta wrote:


I'm gonna wait until the ADS-B requirements are better defined before
buying any equipment.


In general a good strategy. But for anyone installing or upgrading a
transponder today, paying attention to ADS-B would make sense. Putting
in a Mode S that was not upgradeable would not be advised.

Apart from that, pilots intending to fly high in the great SouthWest
should keep in mind that Class 2 transponders like the TT21 are limited
by regulation to 15,000 ft MSL. Certainly not worth it to me to save a
small amount of power and cost by putting up with a limitation like that.

-Dave
  #3  
Old March 4th 16, 07:18 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default ADS-B Compliance

Indeed!

My LAK-17a, which, BTW, is for sale on Wings and Wheels (shameless
plug), has a compliant Trig TT22 transponder installed.

Dan

On 3/3/2016 9:22 PM, David Kinsell wrote:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:32:17 -0700, Dan Marotta wrote:


I'm gonna wait until the ADS-B requirements are better defined before
buying any equipment.

In general a good strategy. But for anyone installing or upgrading a
transponder today, paying attention to ADS-B would make sense. Putting
in a Mode S that was not upgradeable would not be advised.

Apart from that, pilots intending to fly high in the great SouthWest
should keep in mind that Class 2 transponders like the TT21 are limited
by regulation to 15,000 ft MSL. Certainly not worth it to me to save a
small amount of power and cost by putting up with a limitation like that.

-Dave


--
Dan, 5J

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA New Airport Compliance Manual Order 5130.6B for AirportOperations Burt Compton - Marfa Soaring 5 October 24th 09 04:11 AM
MacMillan "Aviation English for ICAO Compliance" Cd contains avirus/trojan jasee General Aviation 1 March 13th 09 07:48 PM
DG1000S AD note , 25 hour compliance, pbc76049 Soaring 0 August 15th 06 04:30 PM
Section 61.89a(8) requires student compliance w/ instructor limitations Shoulbe Soaring 0 August 25th 03 08:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.