![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip?
On 3/2/2016 8:43 PM, 2G wrote: The good news is you can get your info straight from the FAA:http://www.icao.int/APAC/Meetings/20...20briefing.pdf \snip I was just talking with my local FSDO and he laughed and told me that, during his training in Oklahoma city, he was welcomed to the FAA where they have 93 independently operated offices! Yes, they're all supposed to operate under the same rules (the FARs) but they sometimes interpret them differently. For example, when I received my Air Force training in the Rockwell Sabreliner, the FSDO in the region where I took the training considered the aircraft to be a center-line thrust aircraft. So I deferred getting a type rating in the aircraft until I returned to my duty station in a different region where the aircraft was NOT considered to be a center-line thrust aircraft. Voila! I received an unrestricted Airplane Multi-engine Land rating with a type rating for the aircraft. Same rules, different interpretation. I'm gonna wait until the ADS-B requirements are better defined before buying any equipment. -- Dan, 5J |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:32:17 -0700, Dan Marotta wrote:
I'm gonna wait until the ADS-B requirements are better defined before buying any equipment. In general a good strategy. But for anyone installing or upgrading a transponder today, paying attention to ADS-B would make sense. Putting in a Mode S that was not upgradeable would not be advised. Apart from that, pilots intending to fly high in the great SouthWest should keep in mind that Class 2 transponders like the TT21 are limited by regulation to 15,000 ft MSL. Certainly not worth it to me to save a small amount of power and cost by putting up with a limitation like that. -Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Indeed!
My LAK-17a, which, BTW, is for sale on Wings and Wheels (shameless plug), has a compliant Trig TT22 transponder installed. Dan On 3/3/2016 9:22 PM, David Kinsell wrote: On Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:32:17 -0700, Dan Marotta wrote: I'm gonna wait until the ADS-B requirements are better defined before buying any equipment. In general a good strategy. But for anyone installing or upgrading a transponder today, paying attention to ADS-B would make sense. Putting in a Mode S that was not upgradeable would not be advised. Apart from that, pilots intending to fly high in the great SouthWest should keep in mind that Class 2 transponders like the TT21 are limited by regulation to 15,000 ft MSL. Certainly not worth it to me to save a small amount of power and cost by putting up with a limitation like that. -Dave -- Dan, 5J |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA New Airport Compliance Manual Order 5130.6B for AirportOperations | Burt Compton - Marfa | Soaring | 5 | October 24th 09 04:11 AM |
MacMillan "Aviation English for ICAO Compliance" Cd contains avirus/trojan | jasee | General Aviation | 1 | March 13th 09 07:48 PM |
DG1000S AD note , 25 hour compliance, | pbc76049 | Soaring | 0 | August 15th 06 04:30 PM |
Section 61.89a(8) requires student compliance w/ instructor limitations | Shoulbe | Soaring | 0 | August 25th 03 08:30 PM |