A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

For Keith Willshaw...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 10th 04, 04:31 PM
Denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No they didnt - period
http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/congress/part_5.html


Mr.Willshaw you keep offering old documents and/or monkey court archieves as
evidence.
I wonder if you are aware that US Congress passed a resolution in 1999 and
requested full exonoration of Kimmel.
You are still trying to stick old documents that were produced and used by the
establisment to cover up their activites.

But times are changed now not many are taking offical evidences given in old
documents as evidences at all.

Many things that you say "did not happen" is (like secret White House meeting
in the eve of Pearl Harbor attack and discussion of Attack) DID happen
according to sworn testimonies of the Officers.

So basically you are telling everyone "dont believe them,believe only to our
official version".Heck even Members of Congress do not buy it anymore.

Truth is Mr.Willshaw FDR promised nation not to enter WWII unless attacked and
he kept his promise.





  #2  
Old June 10th 04, 09:38 PM
George Z. Bush
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Denyav" wrote in message
...

I wonder if you are aware that US Congress passed a resolution in 1999 and
requested full exonoration of Kimmel.


Just to set the record straight, it wasn't a resolution.....it was in May 2000,
and it was an amendment to the 2001 Defense Bill that requested that both Adm
Kimmel and Gen. Short be advanced posthumously on the promotion list to their
highest respective grades in which they had served. It was passed unanimously,
but President Clinton declined to sign it. It was again presented the following
year, but President Bush also declined to sign it. No reason was given in both
cases.

George Z.


  #3  
Old June 11th 04, 04:35 AM
Denyav
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just to set the record straight, it wasn't a resolution.....it was in May
2000,
and it was an amendment to the 2001 Defense Bill that requested that both Adm
Kimmel and Gen. Short be advanced posthumously on the promotion list to their


ighest respective grades in which they had served. It was passed
unanimously,
but President Clinton declined to sign it. It was again presented the
following
year, but President Bush also declined to sign it. No reason was given in
both
cases.

George Z.


Thanks for correction,I thought it was in 1999.
But as you correctly stated no president ever signed it and I think no
president will ever sign it.
Even no president gave reason for refusal,the reason is very obvious.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Videos: Su-37 Superflanker vs F-22 Raptor Alejandro Magno Military Aviation 20 January 10th 04 05:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.