For Keith Willshaw...

US engagement in WW2 was in response to an attack just before a declaration
of war by Japan and another attack just after a declaration of war by
Germany.


1)If you read some history,you must know that FDR was very eager for US
engagement.
2)If you read history you must also know that that FDR promised the nation not
enter war unless attacked (a requirement of domestic politics)

A solution to satisfy two contradictionary requirements=The Pearl Harbor trap

Pearl Harbor was only one of US (Union) vaccination operations.
Short history of US (Union) is full of such operations ,like
Ft.Sumter,Maine,Pearl Harbor,9/11 you name it.

If Hitler'd won the war , Nazi version of Reichstag fire would be the official
version.period.

Reading history from the books is by no means enough,one must learn to "read"
events themselves.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
US engagement in WW2 was in response to an attack just before a
declaration
of war by Japan and another attack just after a declaration of war by
Germany.


1)If you read some history,you must know that FDR was very eager for US
engagement.
2)If you read history you must also know that that FDR promised the nation
not
enter war unless attacked (a requirement of domestic politics)

A solution to satisfy two contradictionary requirements=The Pearl Harbor
trap

and so you head off into the land of the lunatics.


Pearl Harbor was only one of US (Union) vaccination operations.
Short history of US (Union) is full of such operations ,like
Ft.Sumter,Maine,Pearl Harbor,9/11 you name it.

If Hitler'd won the war , Nazi version of Reichstag fire would be the
official
version.period.

Reading history from the books is by no means enough,one must learn to
"read"
events themselves.

Or to put another way, paranoid dip****s like yourself learn to "read"
anything that matches your delusions into being "truth".

What an "interesting" world you must inhabit, where your totally unsupported
opinion = "truth".

The other name for that condition is "insanity".

and so you head off into the land of the lunatics.


Do you really think that you can supress the truth for forever by resorting to
Ad Hominem attacks?Or to put another way, paranoid dip****s like yourself
learn to "read"
anything that matches your delusions into being "truth".

What an "interesting" world you must inhabit, where your totally unsupported
opinion = "truth".

The other name for that condition is "insanity".

Your nervousness is understandable and fully justified.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
and so you head off into the land of the lunatics.


Do you really think that you can supress the truth for forever by
resorting to
Ad Hominem attacks?

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.


Or to put another way, paranoid dip****s like yourself
learn to "read"
anything that matches your delusions into being "truth".

What an "interesting" world you must inhabit, where your totally
unsupported
opinion = "truth".

The other name for that condition is "insanity".

Your nervousness is understandable and fully justified.

Nervousness that you are insane? - I find it amusing, not scary.

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

As far as I know Sacco&Venzetti too were convicted according to the "truth that
was very well known".

Nervousness that you are insane? - I find it amusing, not scary.

Glad to hear that.

On 12 Jun 2004 01:01:35 GMT, (Denyav) wrote:

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

Really? Can you provide a cite for that? Or is it contained in a scret
document suppressed by the guvmint?

Peter Kemp

In article ,
on 12 Jun 2004 01:01:35 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

In which alternate reality ?

Or is it just all those voices ?

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In which alternate reality

1)Ft.Sumter
2)USS Maine
3)Pearl Harbor
4)9/11

This kind of operations should be a thing of the past,but you can not prevent
the recurrence of such events by covering them up.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it
a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.


And the "figures" for that come from another of your "truths" do they?

Subject: For Keith Willshaw...
From: (Denyav)
Date: 6/10/2004 9:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

US engagement in WW2 was in response to an attack just before a declaration
of war by Japan and another attack just after a declaration of war by
Germany.


1)If you read some history,you must know that FDR was very eager for US
engagement.
2)If you read history you must also know that that FDR promised the nation
not
enter war unless attacked (a requirement of domestic politics)

A solution to satisfy two contradictionary requirements=The Pearl Harbor trap

Pearl Harbor was only one of US (Union) vaccination operations.
Short history of US (Union) is full of such operations ,like
Ft.Sumter,Maine,Pearl Harbor,9/11 you name it.

If Hitler'd won the war , Nazi version of Reichstag fire would be the
official
version.period.etter yet,haave been there.

Reading history from the books is by no means enough,one must learn to "read"
events themselves.

Or better yet,have been there.