For Keith Willshaw...

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

As far as I know Sacco&Venzetti too were convicted according to the "truth that
was very well known".

Nervousness that you are insane? - I find it amusing, not scary.

Glad to hear that.

On 12 Jun 2004 01:01:35 GMT, (Denyav) wrote:

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

Really? Can you provide a cite for that? Or is it contained in a scret
document suppressed by the guvmint?

Peter Kemp

In article ,
on 12 Jun 2004 01:01:35 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.

In which alternate reality ?

Or is it just all those voices ?

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

In which alternate reality

1)Ft.Sumter
2)USS Maine
3)Pearl Harbor
4)9/11

This kind of operations should be a thing of the past,but you can not prevent
the recurrence of such events by covering them up.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
In which alternate reality

1)Ft.Sumter
2)USS Maine
3)Pearl Harbor
4)9/11

This kind of operations should be a thing of the past,but you can not
prevent
the recurrence of such events by covering them up.


Relisting them does not equal proving them. but feel to relist them a few
more times.

1)Ft.Sumter
2)USS Maine
3)Pearl Harbor
4)9/11

Relisting them does not equal proving them. but feel to relist them a few
more times.

It establishes the existence of a pattern or govenment culture.

Its always easier to get an Arson suspect with prior Arson convictions
convicted than an Arson suspect without any prior convictions.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
1)Ft.Sumter
2)USS Maine
3)Pearl Harbor
4)9/11

Relisting them does not equal proving them. but feel to relist them a few
more times.

It establishes the existence of a pattern or govenment culture.

It does no such thing, note the dates - they are different govts, composed
of different people from markedly different backgrounds.



Its always easier to get an Arson suspect with prior Arson convictions
convicted than an Arson suspect without any prior convictions.


Except your "suspect" isn't the same person you loon.

Relist the dates again. you'll feel better.

It does no such thing, note the dates - they are different govts, composed
of different people from markedly different backgrounds.

You make me laugh,succesful operations set patterns.
Nobody wants to repeat failures but eveybody wants to use proven methods.(at
least till first failure),
Ourcome of 1861 operation was good,the ourcome of 1898 operation very good,the
outcome of 1941 operation was excellent.
So why not stick to proven methods

Except your "suspect" isn't the same person you loon.


Maybe not same "person" but definitely the same "entity"

In article ,
on 12 Jun 2004 05:51:59 GMT,
Denyav attempted to say .....

In which alternate reality

1)Ft.Sumter
2)USS Maine
3)Pearl Harbor
4)9/11

This kind of operations should be a thing of the past,but you can not prevent
the recurrence of such events by covering them up.


You are making less and less sense.
Please try providing some proof, some ducumentation of what it is you are
trying to say.

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.

"Denyav" wrote in message
...
The truth is already well known, and I like insulting the insane. call it
a
foible.

Whose truth?

Those who favor the reopening Pearl Harbor case are in majority today.


And the "figures" for that come from another of your "truths" do they?