A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dick Johnson methodology for measuring glider performance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 14th 16, 03:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Nadler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,610
Default Dick Johnson methodology for measuring glider performance

On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 2:45:32 AM UTC-4, Tango Whisky wrote:
The method by Dick Johnson works for gliders with limited performance.
Even in "still air conditions", which are typically found in meterological
high pressure regions, there are wide-area vertical movements of air.
There is no way that the method by DJ can work them out...


In addition to airmass movement, there are a couple other serious problems
with the methods used:

1) The CG of the plane was not controlled.
- what is the effect of forward vs. aft CG on max LD?
- what popular plane was measured with a very low LD due to above?
Discuss amongst yourselves...

2) The number of (and selection of) datapoints is not adequate
Discuss amongst yourselves...



...That's why in Europe, DJ measurements are widely disregarded.


Yup.
  #2  
Old July 14th 16, 04:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default Dick Johnson methodology for measuring glider performance

On Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 9:00:22 AM UTC-5, Dave Nadler wrote:
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 2:45:32 AM UTC-4, Tango Whisky wrote:
The method by Dick Johnson works for gliders with limited performance.
Even in "still air conditions", which are typically found in meterological
high pressure regions, there are wide-area vertical movements of air.
There is no way that the method by DJ can work them out...


In addition to airmass movement, there are a couple other serious problems
with the methods used:

1) The CG of the plane was not controlled.
- what is the effect of forward vs. aft CG on max LD?
- what popular plane was measured with a very low LD due to above?
Discuss amongst yourselves...

2) The number of (and selection of) datapoints is not adequate
Discuss amongst yourselves...



...That's why in Europe, DJ measurements are widely disregarded.


Yup.


For reference see Paul Bikle's "Polars of Eight" in Soaring magazine.
  #3  
Old July 14th 16, 10:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Soartech
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 268
Default Dick Johnson methodology for measuring glider performance

Dave Nadler said
1) The CG of the plane was not controlled.
- what is the effect of forward vs. aft CG on max LD?
- what popular plane was measured with a very low LD due to above?
Discuss amongst yourselves...


So what is the typical percentage change in L/D from full forward CG to maximum rearward CG?
Is it a huge change (10%) or minor change? I have no idea.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dick Johnson Clint Soaring 4 June 6th 09 10:40 PM
Texas Glider Rally / Dick Johnson Wave Camp April 4 - 11 at Marfa Burt Compton - Marfa Soaring 2 March 27th 09 06:55 PM
Dick Johnson is gone. Burt Compton - Marfa Soaring 23 July 27th 08 05:38 PM
Dick Johnson's FTE of the Discus-2 Flavio Formosa Soaring 1 January 18th 07 03:18 PM
Contacts of Dick Johnson Francisco De Almeida Soaring 1 January 1st 06 06:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.