![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
N-6 twisted the electrons to say:
I am unable to tell exaclty from pictures, but are there seperate triggers to fire the cannons only, the machine guns only, and both the cannons and MGs at the same time? Early spitfires had machine guns only, and had a round button on the stick. Later on when they went to a mixed machine gun/cannon armament[1] they fitted a rectangular button. If pressed in the centre it fired both types of gun, if pressed at the top it fired one sort and if pressed at the bottom it fired the other (can't remember which way round tho!). Later on they went cannon-only and I suspose went back to the round buttons? [1] That's the 4x 303 and 2x 20mm combination. There where some high altitude conversions done with 2x .50 and 2x 20mm, and I don't know what arrangements they had ... -- These opinions might not even be mine ... Let alone connected with my employer ... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
btw, I have often read that japanese pilots were unhappy with the MG/cannon
(A6M, J2M) firing with different ballistic behaviour, but never heard about Spit pilots complaints except about the early Hispano jamming and recoil shake. Any hints ? Yann I am unable to tell exaclty from pictures, but are there seperate triggers to fire the cannons only, the machine guns only, and both the cannons and MGs at the same time? Early spitfires had machine guns only, and had a round button on the stick. Later on when they went to a mixed machine gun/cannon armament[1] they fitted a rectangular button. If pressed in the centre it fired both types of gun, if pressed at the top it fired one sort and if pressed at the bottom it fired the other (can't remember which way round tho!). Later on they went cannon-only and I suspose went back to the round buttons? [1] That's the 4x 303 and 2x 20mm combination. There where some high altitude conversions done with 2x .50 and 2x 20mm, and I don't know what arrangements they had ... -- These opinions might not even be mine ... Let alone connected with my employer ... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Yann D" writes: btw, I have often read that japanese pilots were unhappy with the MG/cannon (A6M, J2M) firing with different ballistic behaviour, but never heard about Spit pilots complaints except about the early Hispano jamming and recoil shake. Any hints ? The Japanese 20mm cannon used on the A6ms was a low velocity weapon with a fairly poor ballistic coefficient. (So lots of drop). The 20mm Hispano used by the Brits as a high velocity weapon with a better shell design, and it matched fairly well with the trajectory of teh Browning .30 and .50 guns over teh ranges normally encountered in combat. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Y2K Spitfire restoration project COMOX B.C> | Ed Majden | Military Aviation | 3 | May 23rd 04 08:33 AM |
own a Spitfire! | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 6 | April 18th 04 11:28 PM |
Canadian fighter squadrons during WWII | Ed Majden | Military Aviation | 10 | March 8th 04 05:34 AM |
FS: Spitfire rides in Colorado | David Campbell | Military Aviation | 0 | December 24th 03 03:00 AM |
The urban legend of the buried spitfire parts | MBannister | Military Aviation | 1 | July 28th 03 01:15 AM |