A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 26th 16, 03:24 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Richard[_9_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 551
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 11:15:12 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2016 04:25:15 UTC+3, Sean wrote:
LXNav S10 backup this spring for my new panel. I do not think the butterfly is worth the price...

SMF
7T


What are you backing up with S10? Don't you have mechanical vario?


No need for a mechanical backup the S10 has an internal backup battery for 3 hrs of use.

Richard
www.craggyaero.com
  #2  
Old September 26th 16, 04:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
krasw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 668
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

On Monday, 26 September 2016 17:24:02 UTC+3, Richard wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 11:15:12 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2016 04:25:15 UTC+3, Sean wrote:
LXNav S10 backup this spring for my new panel. I do not think the butterfly is worth the price...

SMF
7T


What are you backing up with S10? Don't you have mechanical vario?


No need for a mechanical backup the S10 has an internal backup battery for 3 hrs of use.

Richard
www.craggyaero.com


Never heard of anyone not having a mechanical vario in glider.
  #3  
Old September 26th 16, 04:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jfitch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,134
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:35:58 AM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2016 17:24:02 UTC+3, Richard wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 11:15:12 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2016 04:25:15 UTC+3, Sean wrote:
LXNav S10 backup this spring for my new panel. I do not think the butterfly is worth the price...

SMF
7T

What are you backing up with S10? Don't you have mechanical vario?


No need for a mechanical backup the S10 has an internal backup battery for 3 hrs of use.

Richard
www.craggyaero.com


Never heard of anyone not having a mechanical vario in glider.


I don't.
  #4  
Old September 26th 16, 07:17 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Renny[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 241
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 9:41:21 AM UTC-6, jfitch wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:35:58 AM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2016 17:24:02 UTC+3, Richard wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 11:15:12 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2016 04:25:15 UTC+3, Sean wrote:
LXNav S10 backup this spring for my new panel. I do not think the butterfly is worth the price...

SMF
7T

What are you backing up with S10? Don't you have mechanical vario?

No need for a mechanical backup the S10 has an internal backup battery for 3 hrs of use.

Richard
www.craggyaero.com


Never heard of anyone not having a mechanical vario in glider.


I don't.


I also do not have a mechanical vario...No need (at least for me) at all....In fact I am somewhat amazed folks are still buying them. Perhaps some clubs still buy them for simplicity or for some other reason, but I haven't had one in many years...
  #5  
Old September 26th 16, 04:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,384
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 8:35:58 AM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2016 17:24:02 UTC+3, Richard wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2016 at 11:15:12 PM UTC-7, krasw wrote:
On Monday, 26 September 2016 04:25:15 UTC+3, Sean wrote:
LXNav S10 backup this spring for my new panel. I do not think the butterfly is worth the price...

SMF
7T

What are you backing up with S10? Don't you have mechanical vario?


No need for a mechanical backup the S10 has an internal backup battery for 3 hrs of use.

Richard
www.craggyaero.com


Never heard of anyone not having a mechanical vario in glider.


The two varios mentioned in the OP are all I have. The mechanical vario went away a long time ago, as did the mechanical compass.
Jim


  #6  
Old September 26th 16, 05:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Daly[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 718
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

I have a CNv-XC-digital as primary, LX S3 secondary. If they fail, I have the seat of my pants...



  #7  
Old September 26th 16, 05:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tango Eight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 962
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 11:35:58 AM UTC-4, krasw wrote:

Never heard of anyone not having a mechanical vario in glider.


I haven't had a mechanical in years. I have a B400 for backup (with AA back up battery pack) but it hasn't been switched on for more than a functional check in about 4 years (the last time I got out to the airport and discovered my batteries hadn't come with me).

Mechanical varios don't play well with modern pressure transducer type varios and should not share TE sources with them.

Evan Ludeman / T8
  #8  
Old September 26th 16, 06:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 190
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation



Mechanical varios don't play well with modern pressure transducer type varios and should not share TE sources with them.

Evan Ludeman / T8


A practice many seem to ignore. Do you think there is any advantage to using a fin mounted Prandtl tube versus fuselage pitot/static ports? Do you prefer mechanical or electronic TE? How do you "plumb" your CNvXC and B400?

  #9  
Old September 26th 16, 07:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tango Eight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 962
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:05:36 PM UTC-4, wrote:

Mechanical varios don't play well with modern pressure transducer type varios and should not share TE sources with them.

Evan Ludeman / T8


A practice many seem to ignore. Do you think there is any advantage to using a fin mounted Prandtl tube versus fuselage pitot/static ports? Do you prefer mechanical or electronic TE? How do you "plumb" your CNvXC and B400?


CNv works great on electronic compensation *provided* the pitot/static system is essentially perfect. The only practical, reliable way to get that is with a triple probe set up on the fin. Don't share the static with mechanical instruments.

I have a triple probe set up plus fuselage static ports.

I plumb all three triple probe sources to CNv, the TE also goes to B400. ASI uses triple probe pitot and fuselage static. CNv works well on the probe (an old venturi style probe) but even better on the pitot/static.

best,
Evan
  #10  
Old September 26th 16, 11:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default AA Butterfly versus CNv LCD wind calculation

The triple probe on the Stemme extends to about 3 feet in front of the
nose. That should be in pretty much undisturbed air.

On 9/26/2016 12:20 PM, Tango Eight wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2016 at 1:05:36 PM UTC-4, wrote:
Mechanical varios don't play well with modern pressure transducer type varios and should not share TE sources with them.

Evan Ludeman / T8

A practice many seem to ignore. Do you think there is any advantage to using a fin mounted Prandtl tube versus fuselage pitot/static ports? Do you prefer mechanical or electronic TE? How do you "plumb" your CNvXC and B400?

CNv works great on electronic compensation *provided* the pitot/static system is essentially perfect. The only practical, reliable way to get that is with a triple probe set up on the fin. Don't share the static with mechanical instruments.

I have a triple probe set up plus fuselage static ports.

I plumb all three triple probe sources to CNv, the TE also goes to B400. ASI uses triple probe pitot and fuselage static. CNv works well on the probe (an old venturi style probe) but even better on the pitot/static.

best,
Evan


--
Dan, 5J
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
302 wind calculation AK Soaring 21 April 3rd 10 01:27 PM
302 wind calculation 5Z Soaring 1 March 26th 10 11:56 AM
302 wind calculation Darryl Ramm Soaring 0 March 26th 10 03:04 AM
302 wind calculation AK Soaring 0 March 26th 10 02:47 AM
Vector Wind, Relative Wind calculation C 302/303 [email protected] Soaring 2 December 9th 08 07:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.