![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , robert
arndt writes http://216.239.37.104/translate_c?hl....de/english/in dex.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3DKMW,%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG M-1A2 is dogmeat. Which presumably explains the dismal failure of the Abrams family every time they're sent into combat, compared to the stellar fighting history and long combat experience of the Leo2s? Now personally I'd say the Challenger 2 has some minor edges over the M1A2 as well as vice versa (like CR2 has an APU under armour, more ammunition and so on) but that both tanks (and the Leo2 as well, actually) were damn good vehicles to take into combat and the differences are largely a matter of preference and style. -- He thinks too much: such men are dangerous. Julius Caesar I:2 Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For Brooks... The Superior Leopard 2 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 53 | May 15th 04 12:48 AM |
Stryker is a piece of shit! | noname | Military Aviation | 53 | May 12th 04 04:11 AM |
Chad Irby is a Liar | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 23 | February 7th 04 10:23 PM |
Ignoring the Challenger? | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | July 1st 03 10:24 AM |