![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dav1936531" wrote in message ... From: "Kevin Brooks" How many snipers do you know who use tracers? Smart money would instead be on him being engaged by an overwatching element (when contact is expected, bounding overwatch being the preferred maneuver scheme). Yeah, I missed the tracers and watched the clip without sound the first time. It's a SAW. Most Army snipers use a Remington bolt action (M-24 IIRC) these days; your "tricked up" M-14 (actually known as the M-21) has been in the decline (if it is not completely replaced already) for years now. Brooks Which doesn't explain the pics of Army snipers toting the M-14 variants I mentioned coming across the Associated Press wire feed on Iraq that is available here on AOL. There was one of a guy covering a field after a convoy ambush just recently with just such a rifle. There was talk of providing the old M-21's down to the unit level for use by "designated marksmen", IIRC, as they were replaced in the sniper role by the M-24; I can remember a time when the standard weapons package for our MSCA-CD (Military Support to Civil Authorities--Civil Disturbance) mission included a couple of M-21's (along with a few 12 ga pump shotguns) in a similar role. That may explain where you saw them--then again, are you sure you were not seeing a SEAL or two (ISTR they sometimes carry the M-14 in desert operations), and not Army folks? Brooks Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dav1936531" wrote in message ... From: "Kevin Brooks" Date: 6/18/04 8:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time Message-id: There was talk of providing the old M-21's down to the unit level for use by "designated marksmen", IIRC, as they were replaced in the sniper role by the M-24; I can remember a time when the standard weapons package for our MSCA-CD (Military Support to Civil Authorities--Civil Disturbance) mission included a couple of M-21's (along with a few 12 ga pump shotguns) in a similar role. That may explain where you saw them--then again, are you sure you were not seeing a SEAL or two (ISTR they sometimes carry the M-14 in desert operations), and not Army folks? Brooks The guy in the pic was definitely Army. It was one of a series of pics showing an Army unit's response to a convoy ambush. The guy in possesion was prone on the side of a ditch covering any enemy advance from a field next to the road where the convoy was ambushed. Couldn't tell you if the rifle was an M-14, M-21, or M-24 though as I am not that familiar with the differences, but it had that basic design of the M-14 (box mag semi-auto) and was equiped with a telescopic sight and bipod. Up until you mentioned the bipod, you had me thinking M-21. But I don't recall seeing any bipods being used with M-21's (and I seriously doubt any of the ones that were at one *distant* time available for M-14's are still around). I guess it could be an M-21 with a bipod, but I have never seen one so equipped (note that the M-24 bolt action replacment does have a bipod included in the kit). OTOH, are you sure you were maybe not gettting a squirrely view of a M-249 (which does indeed have a bipod) with a 30-round magazine in place of the usual drum mag? I am having a problem getting around the whole sniper-with-M21 thing; I had a sniper-type attend a school with me way back in 1995-96, and I can rememeber his telling me they had already replaced the M-21 with the M-24 in his ARNG light infantry battalion (and it was not an "enhanced brigade" unit, either, so their priority of fill would have been about the same as the rest of the Guard units). Brooks Dave |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dav1936531" wrote in message ... From: "Kevin Brooks" Up until you mentioned the bipod, you had me thinking M-21. But I don't recall seeing any bipods being used with M-21's (and I seriously doubt any of the ones that were at one *distant* time available for M-14's are still around). I guess it could be an M-21 with a bipod, but I have never seen one so equipped (note that the M-24 bolt action replacment does have a bipod included in the kit). OTOH, are you sure you were maybe not gettting a squirrely view of a M-249 (which does indeed have a bipod) with a 30-round magazine in place of the usual drum mag? I am having a problem getting around the whole sniper-with-M21 thing; I had a sniper-type attend a school with me way back in 1995-96, and I can rememeber his telling me they had already replaced the M-21 with the M-24 in his ARNG light infantry battalion (and it was not an "enhanced brigade" unit, either, so their priority of fill would have been about the same as the rest of the Guard units). Brooks The pic was on the AP wire feed from Iraq here on AOL. Unfortunately, the articles and pics expire after a given period of time and disappear from the feed so I cannot now call the picture back up and rellok at it. The guy definitely had some variant of the M-14. I have wanted one of these for a long time and recognize it. It was not a bolt action. It was not an M-249. I could have incorrectly recalled that his rifle was equiped with a bipod though. But it certainly was some type of the basic M-14 and had a telescope, and I seem to recall a bipod.....but I saw the pic probably a month and a half or so ago, and my memory isn't what it used to be. Dave I know I posted on this before, but I'll repeat incase it got sucked up in to the great bit bucket in the sky. Yes, at the very minimum I can guaranty that one NYAG unit currently attached to the 1st ID in Iraq have M-14s as issued equipment. They are issued to unit "Marksmen" in addition to which ever flavor of M-16 / M-4 that infantryman is issued. Marksmen are not rated snipers but provide a bit of precision in a spray & pray world. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Keeney" wrote in message ... "Dav1936531" wrote in message ... From: "Kevin Brooks" Up until you mentioned the bipod, you had me thinking M-21. But I don't recall seeing any bipods being used with M-21's (and I seriously doubt any of the ones that were at one *distant* time available for M-14's are still around). I guess it could be an M-21 with a bipod, but I have never seen one so equipped (note that the M-24 bolt action replacment does have a bipod included in the kit). OTOH, are you sure you were maybe not gettting a squirrely view of a M-249 (which does indeed have a bipod) with a 30-round magazine in place of the usual drum mag? I am having a problem getting around the whole sniper-with-M21 thing; I had a sniper-type attend a school with me way back in 1995-96, and I can rememeber his telling me they had already replaced the M-21 with the M-24 in his ARNG light infantry battalion (and it was not an "enhanced brigade" unit, either, so their priority of fill would have been about the same as the rest of the Guard units). Brooks The pic was on the AP wire feed from Iraq here on AOL. Unfortunately, the articles and pics expire after a given period of time and disappear from the feed so I cannot now call the picture back up and rellok at it. The guy definitely had some variant of the M-14. I have wanted one of these for a long time and recognize it. It was not a bolt action. It was not an M-249. I could have incorrectly recalled that his rifle was equiped with a bipod though. But it certainly was some type of the basic M-14 and had a telescope, and I seem to recall a bipod.....but I saw the pic probably a month and a half or so ago, and my memory isn't what it used to be. Dave I know I posted on this before, but I'll repeat incase it got sucked up in to the great bit bucket in the sky. Yes, at the very minimum I can guaranty that one NYAG unit currently attached to the 1st ID in Iraq have M-14s as issued equipment. They are issued to unit "Marksmen" in addition to which ever flavor of M-16 / M-4 that infantryman is issued. Marksmen are not rated snipers but provide a bit of precision in a spray & pray world. I'd be very surprised if they are carrying M14's. The M-14 offers danged little in terms of "precision" versus the M16A2 in the likely ironsight range fan (the A2 is plenty accurate oput to the 300 meter range). I guess they could have some old M-21's (which unlike the M-14 have a telescopic sight)--but which combat unit of the NYARNG is attached to the 1st ID? ISTR that the NYARNG 42nd ID(M) HQ is indeed deploying to Iraq later this year (or early next year?). Brooks |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Kemp" wrote in message ... On 19 Jun 2004 06:04:01 GMT, (Regnirps) wrote: (Dav1936531) wrote: Which doesn't explain the pics of Army snipers toting the M-14 variants I mentioned coming across the Associated Press wire feed on Iraq that is available here on AOL. There was one of a guy covering a field after a convoy ambush just recently with just such a rifle. It's a favorite for some all right. Too bad Clinton gave away to Bosnia and sold to Taiwan for $56 each, 125,000 M14s. After all, he cut the size of the military so drastically, who would need them? Well no, they were already surplus after Bush 41's cuts (which were larger than Clinton's), and most were darn near worn out after 30 years use - check out how much the Phillipinos had to pay to get theirs up to scratch. Can you show what major use of the M-14 went on for thirty years in the US military? The vast majority of M-14's have spent the greatest part of their lives in long-term storage, and the weapon had a very short service life as the primary weapon for troops. Some were rebuilt as M-21's, some have been used by various SOF elements, and IIRC the USN has used some in the shipboard defense role. But most have languished in cosmoline (other than the relative few issued to support military schools, such as West Point, VMI, the Citadel, etc.; and based upon personal experience with a few of those, I can vouch for the fact that those examples are *very* well maintained--doing a week's barracks confinement for "RoR" (rust-on-rifle) was never *my* idea of a fun time during that period of my life... :-) Brooks Peter Kemp |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Baltimore Sun investigation: Abuse goes far beyond the military police | GrPrtrd8 | Military Aviation | 0 | May 11th 04 06:05 AM |
A Great New Web Site for Soldiers! | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 2 | March 15th 04 07:10 AM |
Coalition casualties for October | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 16 | November 4th 03 11:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |