A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

BRAC and Fort Rucker



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 20th 04, 08:53 PM
John Hart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lone Haranguer" wrote in message
...
Fuzzy Footie wrote:

John Hart wrote:

"Fuzzy Footie" wrote in message
...


Glad to hear it, but what's that got to do with the small on post

flight
area for first phase trainees at Fort Rucker? The post has worked for
years in trying to gain more restricted air space for training.

--
Fuzz



That's the point. It ain't all done in a small area in the first
phase. I
went through rotary wing primary training in Ft Woters, TX myself, then
after my first tour in 'Nam, I worked there three years as a primary
flight
instructor. To handle 200 or 300 primary students, a helicopter

primary
school uses up a hell of a lot more airspace than is available at any
post
with an active arty impact area. Got to keep'em clear of the GT line,
out
of the impact area, and completely away from such things as parachute
drops,
not to mention out of commercial air traffic, and seperated from each
other.
Might be able to do all that if you draw a 250 - 300 mile radius around

a
given place, and can control ALL the airspace from the surface upward.



Understood. It sounds like Fort Irwin is the place. Of course, all
those new WO's and Eltees would hate it being so far from Barstow. Of
course, they could make thunder runs to Las Vegas on the weekends.

It is clear there is no easy answer. Therefore, as the government is
wont to do, primary rotor wing training will stay at Rucker, probably
until the end of time.

--
Fuzz


I hear Yuma Proving Ground is on the closing list. Lots of room there
for flight training. A little toasty in summer.
LZ


Yes. However, it's a little too close to the southern international
boundry. Might give rise to an international incident or two, should a
student pilot inadvertantly meander to the south of the line!


  #2  
Old June 21st 04, 05:56 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Hart" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Lone Haranguer" wrote in message
...
Fuzzy Footie wrote:

John Hart wrote:

"Fuzzy Footie" wrote in message
...


Glad to hear it, but what's that got to do with the small on post

flight
area for first phase trainees at Fort Rucker? The post has worked

for
years in trying to gain more restricted air space for training.

--
Fuzz



That's the point. It ain't all done in a small area in the first
phase. I
went through rotary wing primary training in Ft Woters, TX myself,

then
after my first tour in 'Nam, I worked there three years as a primary
flight
instructor. To handle 200 or 300 primary students, a helicopter

primary
school uses up a hell of a lot more airspace than is available at any
post
with an active arty impact area. Got to keep'em clear of the GT

line,
out
of the impact area, and completely away from such things as parachute
drops,
not to mention out of commercial air traffic, and seperated from each
other.
Might be able to do all that if you draw a 250 - 300 mile radius

around
a
given place, and can control ALL the airspace from the surface

upward.



Understood. It sounds like Fort Irwin is the place. Of course, all
those new WO's and Eltees would hate it being so far from Barstow. Of
course, they could make thunder runs to Las Vegas on the weekends.

It is clear there is no easy answer. Therefore, as the government is
wont to do, primary rotor wing training will stay at Rucker, probably
until the end of time.

--
Fuzz


I hear Yuma Proving Ground is on the closing list. Lots of room there
for flight training. A little toasty in summer.
LZ


Yes. However, it's a little too close to the southern international
boundry. Might give rise to an international incident or two, should a
student pilot inadvertantly meander to the south of the line!


I recall my brother relating a story of one of his classmates (this would
have been about 1970) getting a bit turned around on a flight and finally
landing his TH-55 and walking to a nearby farmhouse to ask where the heck he
was; he supposedly did so still wearing his helmet with the visor down...one
can only wonder what the lady's reaction to that sight was.

Brooks




  #3  
Old June 21st 04, 02:09 PM
Lone Haranguer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kevin Brooks wrote:

"John Hart" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Lone Haranguer" wrote in message
...

Fuzzy Footie wrote:


John Hart wrote:


"Fuzzy Footie" wrote in message
...


Glad to hear it, but what's that got to do with the small on post


flight

area for first phase trainees at Fort Rucker? The post has worked


for

years in trying to gain more restricted air space for training.

--
Fuzz



That's the point. It ain't all done in a small area in the first
phase. I
went through rotary wing primary training in Ft Woters, TX myself,


then

after my first tour in 'Nam, I worked there three years as a primary
flight
instructor. To handle 200 or 300 primary students, a helicopter


primary

school uses up a hell of a lot more airspace than is available at any
post
with an active arty impact area. Got to keep'em clear of the GT


line,

out
of the impact area, and completely away from such things as parachute
drops,
not to mention out of commercial air traffic, and seperated from each
other.
Might be able to do all that if you draw a 250 - 300 mile radius


around

a

given place, and can control ALL the airspace from the surface


upward.


Understood. It sounds like Fort Irwin is the place. Of course, all
those new WO's and Eltees would hate it being so far from Barstow. Of
course, they could make thunder runs to Las Vegas on the weekends.

It is clear there is no easy answer. Therefore, as the government is
wont to do, primary rotor wing training will stay at Rucker, probably
until the end of time.

--
Fuzz

I hear Yuma Proving Ground is on the closing list. Lots of room there
for flight training. A little toasty in summer.
LZ


Yes. However, it's a little too close to the southern international
boundry. Might give rise to an international incident or two, should a
student pilot inadvertantly meander to the south of the line!



I recall my brother relating a story of one of his classmates (this would
have been about 1970) getting a bit turned around on a flight and finally
landing his TH-55 and walking to a nearby farmhouse to ask where the heck he
was; he supposedly did so still wearing his helmet with the visor down...one
can only wonder what the lady's reaction to that sight was.

Brooks

In Germany the Army pilots used "roadmap navigation". They just got low
enough to read the name of the town posted on the outskirts.

They didn't have water towers like ours.
LZ

  #4  
Old June 22nd 04, 03:50 AM
John Hart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Lone Haranguer" wrote in message
...
In Germany the Army pilots used "roadmap navigation". They just got low
enough to read the name of the town posted on the outskirts.

They didn't have water towers like ours.
LZ


Not only in Germany, but all over the world where I have been stationed and
flew helicopters. Nothing like having a positive fix on your location.
John Hart


  #5  
Old June 22nd 04, 02:49 PM
OXMORON1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Hart wrote in response to:

In Germany the Army pilots used "roadmap navigation". They just got low
enough to read the name of the town posted on the outskirts.


the following:
Not only in Germany, but all over the world where I have been stationed and
flew helicopters. Nothing like having a positive fix on your location.


Doesn't work well in the central US, especially the Dakotas, Nebraska, Kansas,
Oklahoma. All the small towns are named "Co-Op"

"Hang a right at the big tombstone on top of the cemetary hill, your target is
the warehouse one block north of the Dairy Queen. Exit the target area over the
baseball diamond...."
honest to Gawd quote from a TacEval briefing, circa 1969, of course their chart
and flight plan were outstanding

oxmoron1
MFE


  #6  
Old June 22nd 04, 03:10 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"OXMORON1" wrote in message
...
John Hart wrote in response to:

In Germany the Army pilots used "roadmap navigation". They just got low
enough to read the name of the town posted on the outskirts.


the following:
Not only in Germany, but all over the world where I have been stationed

and
flew helicopters. Nothing like having a positive fix on your location.


Doesn't work well in the central US, especially the Dakotas, Nebraska,

Kansas,
Oklahoma. All the small towns are named "Co-Op"

"Hang a right at the big tombstone on top of the cemetary hill, your

target is
the warehouse one block north of the Dairy Queen. Exit the target area

over the
baseball diamond...."
honest to Gawd quote from a TacEval briefing, circa 1969, of course their

chart
and flight plan were outstanding


Didn't always work too well in Honduras, either. One of TWA's (Teenie Weenie
Airlines, as we referred to the four aircraft UH-1H detachment supporting
our operation in 87-88) missed the base camp on a flight back from what is
now known as Soto Cano and kept happily flying eastward. The FUSA aviation
advisor who was on-hand shook his head and told me if they had not run short
of fuel and had to set down, they'd have made the Nicaraguan border in about
another ten to twenty miles--and 1988 was not a good time for that kind of
thing to happen.

Brooks


oxmoron1
MFE




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.