![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Loved flying the Janus and a Nimbus4D (looks like the same cockpit), but SH left much performance on the table by not updating their fuselage, I think the ASH-25 outsold the Nimbus 4D three to one and the ASH-25 was just a better performing glider, having placed as high at the podium in World Gliding Championships.
As for SH and their adherence to a 1970's fuselage design with a side hinged canopy... I has the fuselage really been updated since the first ventus C? I know they updated the tail feathers from the Vents 2C to the Ventus 2CX, not sure why they could not have designed it right the first time!!! I think it was 8 weeks after I got my new Ventus 2C licensed that SH announced they had finished the design and were now offering the Ventus 2CX. After waiting two years receive a glider that SH knew needed more design work before it was released, I was unhappy. Plus it arrived with x kilograms of weight in the tail when it should have had x pounds, that's right 2.2 times the tail weight it should have had. If you haven't flown a glider past the aft limits, I can tell you it is very squirrly, had difficultly keeping the airspeed between 45 and 75 knots. Does anyone actually like the side hinged canopy? On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:30:39 AM UTC-8, Bruce Hoult wrote: The same canopy fits a mid 1970s Janus and a modern Duo Discus! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 7:48:10 PM UTC+3, Jonathan St. Cloud wrote:
Loved flying the Janus and a Nimbus4D (looks like the same cockpit), but SH left much performance on the table by not updating their fuselage, I think the ASH-25 outsold the Nimbus 4D three to one and the ASH-25 was just a better performing glider, having placed as high at the podium in World Gliding Championships. As for SH and their adherence to a 1970's fuselage design with a side hinged canopy... I has the fuselage really been updated since the first ventus C? I know they updated the tail feathers from the Vents 2C to the Ventus 2CX, not sure why they could not have designed it right the first time!!! I think it was 8 weeks after I got my new Ventus 2C licensed that SH announced they had finished the design and were now offering the Ventus 2CX. After waiting two years receive a glider that SH knew needed more design work before it was released, I was unhappy. Plus it arrived with x kilograms of weight in the tail when it should have had x pounds, that's right 2.2 times the tail weight it should have had. If you haven't flown a glider past the aft limits, I can tell you it is very squirrly, had difficultly keeping the airspeed between 45 and 75 knots. Does anyone actually like the side hinged canopy? On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:30:39 AM UTC-8, Bruce Hoult wrote: The same canopy fits a mid 1970s Janus and a modern Duo Discus! I've seldom flown anything else! Blanik -- side hinged Twin Astir -- 2x side hinged Janus -- side hinged Duo -- side hinged DG1000 -- 2x side hinged PW5 -- front hinged Club Libelle -- rear hinged ASK21 -- 1x front hinged, 1x rear hinged Ka6 and Std Libelle -- totally unhinged |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Must be late in Moscow! Side hinged is a pain when assembly or if you take two steps away from canopy and there is a wind gust.
On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 1:55:39 PM UTC-8, Bruce Hoult wrote: On Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 7:48:10 PM UTC+3, Jonathan St. Cloud wrote: Loved flying the Janus and a Nimbus4D (looks like the same cockpit), but SH left much performance on the table by not updating their fuselage, I think the ASH-25 outsold the Nimbus 4D three to one and the ASH-25 was just a better performing glider, having placed as high at the podium in World Gliding Championships. As for SH and their adherence to a 1970's fuselage design with a side hinged canopy... I has the fuselage really been updated since the first ventus C? I know they updated the tail feathers from the Vents 2C to the Ventus 2CX, not sure why they could not have designed it right the first time!!! I think it was 8 weeks after I got my new Ventus 2C licensed that SH announced they had finished the design and were now offering the Ventus 2CX. After waiting two years receive a glider that SH knew needed more design work before it was released, I was unhappy. Plus it arrived with x kilograms of weight in the tail when it should have had x pounds, that's right 2.2 times the tail weight it should have had. If you haven't flown a glider past the aft limits, I can tell you it is very squirrly, had difficultly keeping the airspeed between 45 and 75 knots. Does anyone actually like the side hinged canopy? On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:30:39 AM UTC-8, Bruce Hoult wrote: The same canopy fits a mid 1970s Janus and a modern Duo Discus! I've seldom flown anything else! Blanik -- side hinged Twin Astir -- 2x side hinged Janus -- side hinged Duo -- side hinged DG1000 -- 2x side hinged PW5 -- front hinged Club Libelle -- rear hinged ASK21 -- 1x front hinged, 1x rear hinged Ka6 and Std Libelle -- totally unhinged |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team Selection Policy Changes | John Godfrey (QT)[_2_] | Soaring | 84 | September 27th 10 08:03 PM |
Potential Club Class (US Sports Class) World Team SelectionPolicy Changes | Andy[_10_] | Soaring | 0 | September 19th 10 10:33 PM |
world class contest | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | July 23rd 08 05:38 AM |
World Class PW-5 Contest at Marfa, TX | Burt Compton - Marfa | Soaring | 13 | June 22nd 06 07:00 PM |
Region 7 contest attracts former Open Class World Champion | Rich Carlson | Soaring | 2 | May 14th 04 06:04 AM |