A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

JS3 chatter



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 15th 16, 04:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 190
Default JS3 chatter

The included 3-view only shows 15M. Is it not intended to be 15-18M?


  #2  
Old December 15th 16, 04:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Steve Leonard[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,076
Default JS3 chatter

On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 10:01:02 AM UTC-6, wrote:
The included 3-view only shows 15M. Is it not intended to be 15-18M?


Spec page says it has a 4 piece wing. Doesn't look like enough "crank" in the wing to be a real trailer issue. I would guess there may be another span option to follow soon.

Steve Leonard
  #3  
Old December 15th 16, 04:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tony[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,965
Default JS3 chatter

It was noted on Facebook that the Vne chart on the panel lists 15m and 18m spans. Jump to your own conclusions...
  #4  
Old December 15th 16, 05:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
krasw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 668
Default JS3 chatter

My calculator says 267 kg empty with 8,7m2 wing.
  #5  
Old December 16th 16, 01:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default JS3 chatter

Polydihedral wing already has an increased roll stability, moving the wing upward increase further roll stability.

I don't know if this is an advantage.

  #6  
Old December 16th 16, 04:39 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default JS3 chatter

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:43:36 -0800, orsica wrote:

Polydihedral wing already has an increased roll stability, moving the
wing upward increase further roll stability.

More to the point, tip dihedral and polyhedral both give more stability
that a single panel dihedralled wing for a given tip rise jjust as a gull
wing gives less stability.

Whether you get more or less stability from a given dihedral schema
depends on both the amount of wing sweepback and the hight of the tip
above the root.

The JS3 and Arcus both use sweepback as well as polyhedral, so can use
less dihedral to achieve the required lateral stability.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cockpit Chatter and Groundcrew Gripes Andie Ankey-Upcuff General Aviation 1 June 9th 05 02:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.