![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The included 3-view only shows 15M. Is it not intended to be 15-18M?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, December 15, 2016 at 10:01:02 AM UTC-6, wrote:
The included 3-view only shows 15M. Is it not intended to be 15-18M? Spec page says it has a 4 piece wing. Doesn't look like enough "crank" in the wing to be a real trailer issue. I would guess there may be another span option to follow soon. Steve Leonard |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was noted on Facebook that the Vne chart on the panel lists 15m and 18m spans. Jump to your own conclusions...
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My calculator says 267 kg empty with 8,7m2 wing.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Polydihedral wing already has an increased roll stability, moving the wing upward increase further roll stability.
I don't know if this is an advantage. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 05:43:36 -0800, orsica wrote:
Polydihedral wing already has an increased roll stability, moving the wing upward increase further roll stability. More to the point, tip dihedral and polyhedral both give more stability that a single panel dihedralled wing for a given tip rise jjust as a gull wing gives less stability. Whether you get more or less stability from a given dihedral schema depends on both the amount of wing sweepback and the hight of the tip above the root. The JS3 and Arcus both use sweepback as well as polyhedral, so can use less dihedral to achieve the required lateral stability. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cockpit Chatter and Groundcrew Gripes | Andie Ankey-Upcuff | General Aviation | 1 | June 9th 05 02:57 AM |