![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 6:46:25 AM UTC-8, Sarah wrote:
On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 7:56:54 PM UTC-6, jfitch wrote: What are the consequences of having a Trig 21 vs 22, in both the TABS regulations and pure functionality? I understand that a Trig 21 may not meet TABS regulations, if there ever comes to be some. But will it actually function, if wired to the Trig TN72 source? I would think either would be fine. They are almost identical except in power output. There are actually no TABS regulations other than the TSO. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/91.227 goes on and on about UAT and TSO-166 specifications but doesn't mention TABS. We will see when more information comes out of Trig. For instance - It would be really nice if the required antenna wasn't larger than the TN72 and more expensive. Available for preorder http://www.craggyaero.com/nav_com.htm First quarter of 2017 More information to follow on website Richard www.craggyaero.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Do It Yourself" airborne proximity warning device | Linar Yusupov | Soaring | 101 | September 2nd 19 02:41 AM |
TABS | Peter von Tresckow | Soaring | 1 | March 11th 16 08:31 PM |
5.7" Mirasol Android Device | Craig Funston[_2_] | Soaring | 10 | March 3rd 12 10:02 PM |
Guitar Chords/Tabs for "Ridge Runner" | [email protected] | Soaring | 3 | November 20th 08 05:00 AM |
"View Limiting Device" recommendations please | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 27 | February 4th 08 02:25 AM |