![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 10:04:36 PM UTC-5, Tom BravoMike wrote:
If ADS-B/In provides the 3D information, which is next used in a variety of softwa ForeFlight, iFlyGPS, XCSoar (pending, hopefully), what can stop the programmers to calculate potential collisions and give similar alerts to those of FLARM? Isn't it all about universality of the system and availability of reliable data between ALL users of the airspace: powerplanes, gliders, trikes AND drones? Tom BravoMike BraveMike, compute power is the only thing that might stop this , but I doubt it will since hardware performance is accelerating at high rate (maybe with the exception of WGC gaggles). PowerFlarm has very low compute power, probably to keep power consumption low and to keep hardware cost low (although that has not been passed onto a consumer). When PowerFlarm was invented hardware computing power was low so they made the best algorithm possible and it worked for many years. The drones will probably drive this market. They will have to have technology to avoid collisions. I would also think that lower cost and energy efficient transponders are going to show up as well. Just my opinion, I can't predict the future. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 4:07:14 AM UTC-7, Andrzej Kobus wrote:
On Friday, February 3, 2017 at 10:04:36 PM UTC-5, Tom BravoMike wrote: If ADS-B/In provides the 3D information, which is next used in a variety of softwa ForeFlight, iFlyGPS, XCSoar (pending, hopefully), what can stop the programmers to calculate potential collisions and give similar alerts to those of FLARM? Isn't it all about universality of the system and availability of reliable data between ALL users of the airspace: powerplanes, gliders, trikes AND drones? Tom BravoMike BraveMike, compute power is the only thing that might stop this , but I doubt it will since hardware performance is accelerating at high rate (maybe with the exception of WGC gaggles). PowerFlarm has very low compute power, probably to keep power consumption low and to keep hardware cost low (although that has not been passed onto a consumer). When PowerFlarm was invented hardware computing power was low so they made the best algorithm possible and it worked for many years. The drones will probably drive this market. They will have to have technology to avoid collisions. I would also think that lower cost and energy efficient transponders are going to show up as well. Just my opinion, I can't predict the future. http://www.uavionix.com/products/ping2020/ UAV ADS-B transceiver. As it's available now, before the manned version, perhaps it validates what is driving this market. No particularly cheap. Frank Whiteley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Preliminary Assessment of the Potential Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Space-Based Weapons. | Mike[_7_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 2nd 07 03:18 PM |
Who has fitted a TRI-band ELT to a TB20? | Chris G. | General Aviation | 0 | June 28th 05 03:21 PM |
Radio band scanner | Fritz | General Aviation | 3 | October 14th 04 07:36 PM |
Band of brothers | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 10 | March 9th 04 10:44 PM |
SSR Receiver | Steven Archibald | General Aviation | 0 | November 6th 03 09:41 AM |