A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Using new variometer technology to display real time lift coefficient?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 8th 17, 06:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bruce Hoult
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 961
Default Using new variometer technology to display real time lift coefficient?

On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 5:44:26 PM UTC+3, wrote:
Thanks to all for the useful input. I was mostly interested in throwing this topic up in the air, and seeing where it landed.

For myself, I agree with a previous post that training is important. Indeed, I would argue that training gives the best reward for the time spent.

However, you can supplement training with other goodies (most everyone is flying with some sort of TE compensation for their varios, some have varios that depict the real time wind vector, and many have moving map displays with little tiny ‘amoebas’ crawling all over them for example…)

Someone alluded to seat-of-the-pants flying to ‘feel’ how close you are flying to the stall. This works, and is used by all of us most of the time. I submit that when a pilot is distracted (low level circling in a rough thermal, on a windy day, with the associated drift illusions, and then throw in a FLARM target….) perhaps his feel may be momentarily masked or overridden….Then, wouldn’t it be nice to have a little audio ‘blip’ to warn us that we are suddenly 5% above the stall?

In addition, if we follow this seat of the pants flying to a logical extreme, perhaps we should get rid of the ASI (fly attitude), and also drop the altimeter (we can, after all, look at how big the houses and trees are getting).


Legally-required minimum equipment.

We had (and won) a fight against the local tower guys several years ago. When we called "joining" they told us (along with the traffic, which is useful) the QNH and expected us to read it back. We told them it's a waste of everyone's time and that by the time we've decided to join circuit we're not looking at the altimeter any more. We also convinced them to only tell us about the traffic actually in or very near the circuit, not the ones still five minutes away.

We have students who are near solo do a flight or two with instruments covered. Not a big deal even in a heavy and slippery glider such as the DG1000. I wouldn't want to try to do an outlanding into a 100m field without ASI, but if you've got 400 or 500 meters of space then it's just not an issue.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT 4 airport round robin - time lapsed / real time with ATC COMS -video A Lieberma[_2_] Owning 0 August 30th 09 12:26 AM
OT 4 airport round robin - time lapsed / real time with ATC COMS -video [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 0 August 30th 09 12:26 AM
Rotor lift coefficient devi Rotorcraft 1 September 25th 05 01:17 AM
about lift and drag coefficient for cessna C-160 Grandss Piloting 9 August 15th 05 06:15 PM
Real-time real world air traffic in flight sims Marty Ross Simulators 6 September 1st 03 04:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.