![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SF wrote on 3/9/2017 6:16 PM:
Yes worth it. Higher voltage will be appreciated by the radio. The radio will show it's appreciation by using less current; otherwise, a "modern" radio won't care. "Modern" radios use power regulators that provide the correct wattage to the radio, within a wide range of input voltages. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Dec 2014a" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://soaringsafety.org/prevention/...anes-2014A.pdf |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My Dittle FSG60M, (May it RIP after it's death three weeks ago) Was the first thing in the airplane that suffered from the effects of low voltage. It seemed to receive just fine, but it made me sound like a Wookie when trying to transmit. That is the source material for my radio comment.
I've hated sailplane batteries ever since one died on a gold distance badge flight, I was 10 miles out at 6,000 FT. My argument that the landing witness should suffice for the missing final 10 miles of the .igc file, wasn't persuasive enough, so I had to do it again, with a different battery. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SF wrote on 3/12/2017 5:15 PM:
My Dittle FSG60M, (May it RIP after it's death three weeks ago) Was the first thing in the airplane that suffered from the effects of low voltage. Definitely not a "modern radio", as the design is over 37 years old, but it was a very good radio back then. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Dec 2014a" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://soaringsafety.org/prevention/...anes-2014A.pdf |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mine is a Terra 720 and suffers badly during transmit when voltage drops below 12v so I have always made 14v packs which are over 3+ years old now and need replacing. Hence the quandary about new Lifepo4's I am in communication with "Dakota" batteries and they are putting a BMS system into there batteries the has cell balancing starting in April sometime. And are selling for about $90 ea for 10 amp hour.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had my K2's for about five years now. Last spring I bought a CTEK LiFePo4 charger, which has 8 stages and ran the batteries through several recharges. Each time the batteries seemed to absorb a bit more.
Last week I flew one battery for over 7 hours on two flights. The Air Glide S showed the voltage flipping between 11.9 & 12.1. Note that the Air Glide S seems to underread by about 0.6V compared to the Tasman. Poking around with probes showed no drop in voltage between the battery and the Air Glide. Back on the charger it took over three hours to get the battery back up to float. The charger was quite warm for the 2.5 hours in stage 2. The other battery flown for three hours charged back up in a little over an hour. I suspect that the batteries need heavier usage than just 3-4 hours of flight before accepting a full recharge. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 08/08/2018 10:08 AM, George Haeh wrote:
I've had my K2's for about five years now. Last spring I bought a CTEK LiFePo4 charger, which has 8 stages and ran the batteries through several recharges. Each time the batteries seemed to absorb a bit more. Last week I flew one battery for over 7 hours on two flights. The Air Glide S showed the voltage flipping between 11.9 & 12.1. Note that the Air Glide S seems to underread by about 0.6V compared to the Tasman. Poking around with probes showed no drop in voltage between the battery and the Air Glide. Back on the charger it took over three hours to get the battery back up to float. The charger was quite warm for the 2.5 hours in stage 2. The other battery flown for three hours charged back up in a little over an hour. I suspect that the batteries need heavier usage than just 3-4 hours of flight before accepting a full recharge. You've got two old batteries, with two different state of charges. Rather than speculating on some memory effect, it might be more likely that the batteries are no longer equivalent, perhaps one has a few weak cells and needs a bunch of balancing. That was an interesting thread you bumped, didn't realize just how much misinformation got crammed into that one. Someone stated that you don't charge a LI-PO battery with a SLA charger, certainly a true statement. Multiple people responded by saying that it's fine to charge an LFP with a SLA charger. It's almost as if they don't know the difference. With all the discussion about how typical BMS boards need high voltage applied for a long period of time in order to balance cells, some people still think the SLA charger works fine for LFP. I guess it's fine as long as you don't care about the lifetime of your battery, and if you don't care about getting a full charge. Then there was another discussion about how radios supposedly last longer with higher voltage, because someone's 37 year old radio just died. I really don't think it would have lasted any longer no matter what voltage was used. Similarly, radios that we use don't draw less current with higher voltage, the only instrument in your panel that might draw a bit less current is a transponder. -Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"the only instrument in your panel that
might draw a bit less current is a transponder" I seriously doubt it. All modern avionics are designed to operate over a wide input voltage range; they have internal dc-dc conversion circuits that transform the supply voltage to a regulated, operating voltage. Trig, for instance, specifies an input voltage of 11 to 33 V. Tom |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I installed a small coulometer (with LCD-display, available from Ebay) between my charger and battery. I can also discharge battery (with car tail light bulb as load) with coulometer. For example, before disconnecting charger I can see that charger put 3 Ah to battery. Annual test shows total capacity from 100% charge to 0%. No more guesswork about battery condition.
There would be market for full-blown panel mounted battery monitor system for gliders. One that monitors each battery charge and discharge, with built in breakers etc. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Aug 2018 23:55:38 -0700, krasw wrote:
I installed a small coulometer (with LCD-display, available from Ebay) between my charger and battery. Multi-chemistry chargers are sold for RC model flying that are also suitable for checking capacity on our batteries and can handle any chemistry that is normally used in gliders. Prices vary (of course) depending on capabilities, but are generally reasonable unless you want the sort of gorilla charger used by the F5x crowd. In the USA HobbyKing would a a reasonable place to start looking. But, none of them will fit in a glider's panel. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LifePO4 batteries for motorgliders - are we there yet? | Chris | Soaring | 13 | January 9th 16 03:43 PM |
Bioenno Power LiFePO4 12V Glider Batteries | Paul Remde | Soaring | 13 | April 21st 15 04:35 PM |
K2 vs. StarkPower LiFePo4 batteries | Fox Two[_2_] | Soaring | 36 | April 16th 15 05:14 PM |
LiFePO4 Batteries | vontresc | Soaring | 56 | June 27th 14 07:25 PM |
LiFePO4 batteries | JS | Soaring | 26 | October 15th 12 02:51 PM |