If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
All US Records are Now Motor Glider Records
On 3/13/2017 12:40 PM, jfitch wrote:
Snip... There may be some motorglider pilots that fly too low into unlandable terrain. This is an advantage, but a self correcting problem. Other than that, the motor saves the inconvenience and cost of a retrieve, nothing more. The cost is questionable, as the price of the motor is far more than either a lifetime of air retrieves or a paid help crew. The convenience is undeniable. Should there be a separate record for people who have paid for the convenience of a one man rigging outfit? Should there be a separate record for the convenience of a glider with automatic connecting controls? Should motorgliders get a speed bonus, due to the inconvenient extra maintenance and expense required? Hmmm...and trying to reiterate a point I sought to make in an earlier post... Extracting a quote (since I raised cost as a very real distinguishing issue between engineless and powered sailplanes to many 'Joe Average' glider types [e.g. me] in an earlier post): "The cost is questionable, as the price of the motor is far more than either a lifetime of air retrieves or a paid help crew." Maybe I missed it when I used to work in various businesses requiring engineering support (the 'excess salary' they threw my direction therefrom supporting my glidering), but both the business and myself accounted distinctly differently between large capital expenses (e.g. my glider) and running costs. So what if in the long run the total cash outlay happens to come out 'relatively even?' (I've never sought to check.) It's meaningless to the guy paying the bill (whether from future company profits, or saved 'excess salary'). What matters is, "Can I afford/risk it given today's cashflow?" And to go from ignoring capital cost as a seriously distinguishing difference between "pure" and "auxiliary-powered" sailplanes, to "reductio ad absurdum" rhetorical questions, doesn't change the fact that equating pure/powered categories by no longer distinguishing between the categories is - in a record-keeping sense - to bureaucratically pretend apples and oranges are equivalent. It simply ain't so... I have no problem with a separate "pure" glider record in the US. Given that worldwide 80% of new gliders have motors, this will become an increasingly esoteric corner of soaring. We still keep 1-26 records right? But along with that I demand categories separated by wing loading, which has a far greater affect on speed and distance. Have at it. Maybe IGC will listen, since they would appear ready to entertain at least one other spurious category. Respectfully, Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
distance records | Ron Gleason | Soaring | 4 | July 6th 12 04:27 AM |
Distance records ..... | Ron Gleason | Soaring | 0 | July 4th 12 03:02 AM |
New Records in Arizona | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 2 | June 15th 07 07:50 PM |
STC records at FAA | [email protected] | Owning | 6 | April 2nd 05 04:01 PM |
Updates to my records. | Fred Blair | Soaring | 5 | November 7th 04 05:08 PM |