![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
However it seems the used marketplace is overflowing with good gliders at
reasonable prices even less than $25,000. Why aren't more pilots buying these ships? Been pondering the same question ever since 1st-generation glass and I showed up on the soaring scene at roughly the same time... Elsewhere in the thread others have cogently commented on factors impacting current-production costs and (non-)growth of soaring, so below is an off-the-top-of-my-head list of possible contributors specifically to the above question: - human nature (the common perception that newer is always better) - ignorance (who systemically touts older ships?) - Fear/Uncertainty/Doubt (old = structurally dodgy; lousy performance; higher maintenance costs; harder to fly; etc.) As a cheap, low-use-impact, non-greenie, cost/mission-driven weirdo myself, I suppose with the money not spent over the years required to maintain "the latest and greatest things" in my toy collection, I could've eventually splurged on today's latest Gee-WhizBang Mark IV self-launching international record breaker, but no way could that have been possible throughout all of my soaring participation. Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|