Question - CinC and UCMJ

Is the Commander in Chief subject to the UCMJ when dealing with
military matters? An inquiring mind (me) wants to know.
Walt BJ

Who would convene proceedings on him?

The way the framers dealt with misconduct in the executive was by including the
imeachment process.

Of course the framers never thought the Congress would be so lame or partisan
as the one we have right now.

Walt

If the CinC was subject to the UCMJ slick willy would have got it for
adultery.

"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
Is the Commander in Chief subject to the UCMJ when dealing with
military matters? An inquiring mind (me) wants to know.
Walt BJ

Who would convene proceedings on him?

The way the framers dealt with misconduct in the executive was by
including the
imeachment process.

Of course the framers never thought the Congress would be so lame or
partisan
as the one we have right now.

Walt

Subject: Question - CinC and UCMJ
From: "DavidG35"
Date: 6/26/2004 5:28 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: 8soDc.449$nc.414@fed1read03

If the CinC was subject to the UCMJ slick willy would have got it for
adultery.

"WalterM140" wrote in message
...
Is the Commander in Chief subject to the UCMJ when dealing with
military matters? An inquiring mind (me) wants to know.
Walt BJ

Who would convene proceedings on him?

The way the framers dealt with misconduct in the executive was by
including the
imeachment process.

Of course the framers never thought the Congress would be so lame or
partisan
as the one we have right now.

Walt


Clinton was not in the military therefore he could not have been tried under
the UCMJ. Milligan vs. United States 1865


Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer