![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay. What threw me off was the Trig website where it says:
"The TN72 GPS receiver is a fully certified product (FAA TSO-C199) designed for voluntary equipage and use in areas OUTSIDE of designated or mandated ADS-B airspace." I took that to mean that TABS could NOT be used INSIDE 'designated or mandated ADS-B airspace' and took the marketing statement as a distillation of applicable FAR. Class E airspace above 10,000 is INSIDE ADS-B airspace. (It is perfectly clear that TABS does not satisfy the ADS-B 2020 mandate.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can see how that can be confusing. But Trig are talking about power aircraft that don't have an ADS-B exemption.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insurance Options? | Jonathan St. Cloud | Soaring | 2 | October 22nd 15 01:25 AM |
What Options? | gpick | Piloting | 12 | September 3rd 10 01:57 AM |
LED options | Ken Gage | Home Built | 2 | November 8th 07 12:01 AM |
A Preliminary Assessment of the Potential Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Space-Based Weapons. | Mike[_7_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 2nd 07 03:18 PM |
Options | [email protected] | Soaring | 32 | March 14th 05 05:33 PM |