![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a simple in flight test used with RC gliders.
Some of which are getting to be quite big these days and a subsection of which fly faster than 500 mph (up hill, into wind, that was measured at) So, probably, has some application in our sport. Fly at whatever speed you are normally trimmed at and put the glider into a dive (not particularly steep, say 30 deg nose down) and let the glider do what it wants from there. (staying below Va or Vne depending on conditions) If the glider stays at that angle an RC glider has it's CofG perfect (for us that means our CofG is a bit too far back as we need more stability in pitch than the RC gliders) If the glider pitches down and increases the dive, your CofG is too far back (flying surfaces are keeping the nose down and their effect becomes more pronounced as speed builds) If the glider recovers back to flat n level then the CofG on ours is about right, on an RC glider it's a bit too far forward. The other check to make before you do this: note where your trimmer is in normal flight, after landing put the trimmer back there and look at the elevator. Ideally, when your CofG is right, your elevator should be in line with the horizontal stab at "Normal" trim (it probably isn't as your CofG will be a bit forward to give the glider longitudinal stability) So, the RC glider test will show where your inflight CofG is (note, your center of pressure will move relative to your CofG depending on speed) Modern gliders are designed to be stable. Older gliders too (but usually not so well) A slightly forward CofG gives you stability A very forward CofG gives you lots of drag. A rearward CofG gives your wife hope for the next husband to be better . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ehhhh...that can work, but.........doesn't help to determine CG envelope when your butt is in the glider. Static on the ground (done properly) tells you where you are before getting in.
-Centered CG is nice. -Forward CG can be good for training/low timers. If you don't pay attention to pitch and relax on the stick the glider will speed up, staying away from stall. -For XC, sit on the ground, mark the stick where the elevator is neutral to the stab, fly, see where the stick is flying a constant speed used for XC, change weight (CG) until the glider flies hands off at the required speed (stick relative to mark made before on neutral controls). This is usually an aft CG. Yes, I have accidentally flown a CG out the backside before....once (ASW-20). Over the top spin entries when doing zoomies into thermals told me something was not right. The glider owner (flying tow at that time and saw a couple spins) asked over the radio, "spin much Chuck?!?!". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
302 wind calculation | 5Z | Soaring | 1 | March 26th 10 11:56 AM |
302 wind calculation | AK | Soaring | 0 | March 26th 10 02:47 AM |
flight computer calculation | Tim | General Aviation | 1 | April 26th 05 10:40 AM |
Three leg GS to TAS calculation | Mike Rapoport | Owning | 21 | September 12th 04 04:37 AM |
The "Complex" TAS calculation | Arnold Pieper | Soaring | 2 | December 14th 03 12:22 PM |