A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Surface radiators for water cooled engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 2nd 03, 10:05 PM
Russell Kent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ernest Christley wrote:

The military is exempt from patent restrictions,


I doubt that statement is true, but I have no facts to either prove or
disprove the statement. In any case, the U.S. military does not (as a rule)
manufacture much of its own equipment. That is done by subcontractors who
are very much bound by U.S. patent law.

Russell Kent

  #2  
Old July 3rd 03, 01:51 AM
Michael McNulty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Russell Kent" wrote in message
...
Ernest Christley wrote:

The military is exempt from patent restrictions,


I doubt that statement is true, but I have no facts to either prove or
disprove the statement. In any case, the U.S. military does not (as a

rule)
manufacture much of its own equipment. That is done by subcontractors who
are very much bound by U.S. patent law.

Russell Kent

Actually, the normal U.S. military development contract has a clause called
"authorization and consent" that specifically authorizes the contractor to
infringe on any patents that it sees fit too, and whereby the U.S.
government consents to accept any liability associated with this
infringement (i.e. they agree to allow themselves to be sued by the patent
holder).

Believe it or not.


  #3  
Old July 3rd 03, 02:38 PM
Bob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AND, patents are issued by the US Government AND they retain certain
rights in return for the protection they afford.

Just like trying to sue the Government, it's their party.



"Michael McNulty" wrote in message ...
"Russell Kent" wrote in message
...
Ernest Christley wrote:

The military is exempt from patent restrictions,


I doubt that statement is true, but I have no facts to either prove or
disprove the statement. In any case, the U.S. military does not (as a

rule)
manufacture much of its own equipment. That is done by subcontractors who
are very much bound by U.S. patent law.

Russell Kent

Actually, the normal U.S. military development contract has a clause called
"authorization and consent" that specifically authorizes the contractor to
infringe on any patents that it sees fit too, and whereby the U.S.
government consents to accept any liability associated with this
infringement (i.e. they agree to allow themselves to be sued by the patent
holder).

Believe it or not.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.