Bush flew fighter jets, but never over VIETNAM.

WalterM140 wrote:
Of course he knew about the Golf Courses- he volunteered for
deployment to Vietnam, as you have known for some time, as it came
up several times in the newspapers, these forums, and even
television news.


No. At least on one occasion Bush declined to volunteer for Viet Nam.


Here is the link that proves this:

http://awolbush.com/images/kerr_bush_nam.gif

Have you some proof that Bush ever changed this?



Walt

Since that form doesn't have a date, and according to the first
section, deals with being recalled for non-flying duty, it appears
to deal with inactive duty after going off active duty, and is
therefore irrelevant to the discussion. Perhaps the (obviously
objective) owner of the site "awolbush.com" would provide the rest
of the form so that we might see the actual context of the
form?

I'll not hold my breath waiting, if you don't mind...

The volunteering for deployment in the F-102 was covered quite
some time ago- during the 2000 Presidential campaign, as I recall..

Mike

No. At least on one occasion Bush declined to volunteer for Viet Nam.


Here is the link that proves this:

http://awolbush.com/images/kerr_bush_nam.gif

Have you some proof that Bush ever changed this?



Walt

Since that form doesn't have a date, and according to the first
section, deals with being recalled for non-flying duty, it appears
to deal with inactive duty after going off active duty, and is
therefore irrelevant to the discussion. Perhaps the (obviously
objective) owner of the site "awolbush.com" would provide the rest
of the form so that we might see the actual context of the
form?


It shows that on at least one occasion, Bush declined to volunteer for overseas
service.

It he changed that later, I'd be glad of some proof.


Walt

No. At least on one occasion Bush declined to volunteer for Viet Nam.


Here is the link that proves this:

http://awolbush.com/images/kerr_bush_nam.gif

Have you some proof that Bush ever changed this?



Walt

Since that form doesn't have a date,

See this link that shows that Bush declined to volunteer for overseas duty in
February, 1968:

http://www.motherjones.com/news/upda...02/02_400.html


Walt

Subject: Bush flew fighter jets, but never over VIETNAM.
From: (WalterM140)
Date: 7/11/2004 8:56 AM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id:

No. At least on one occasion Bush declined to volunteer for Viet Nam.


Here is the link that proves this:

http://awolbush.com/images/kerr_bush_nam.gif

Have you some proof that Bush ever changed this?



Walt

Since that form doesn't have a date, and according to the first
section, deals with being recalled for non-flying duty, it appears
to deal with inactive duty after going off active duty, and is
therefore irrelevant to the discussion. Perhaps the (obviously
objective) owner of the site "awolbush.com" would provide the rest
of the form so that we might see the actual context of the
form?


It shows that on at least one occasion, Bush declined to volunteer for
overseas
service.

It he changed that later, I'd be glad of some proof.


Walt


Don't hold your breath.



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

It he changed that later, I'd be glad of some proof.


Walt


Don't hold your breath.

I didn't keep track, Art. But it seems to just a flat lie.

Walt

Subject: Bush flew fighter jets, but never over VIETNAM.
From: Mike Williamson
Date: 7/11/2004 7:57 AM Pac

Since that form doesn't have a date, and according to the first
section, deals with being recalled for non-flying duty, it appears
to deal with inactive duty after going off active duty, and is
therefore irrelevant to the discussion. Perhaps the (obviously
objective) owner of the site "awolbush.com" would provide the rest
of the form so that we might see the actual context of the
form?

I'll not hold my breath waiting, if you don't mind...

The volunteering for deployment in the F-102 was covered quite
some time ago- during the 2000 Presidential campaign, as I recall..

Mike



The man didn't want to fight. End of story.



Arthur Kramer
344th BG 494th BS
England, France, Belgium, Holland, Germany
Visit my WW II B-26 website at:
http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer

(ArtKramr) wrote:
Mike Williamson wrote:

The volunteering for deployment in the F-102 was covered quite
some time ago- during the 2000 Presidential campaign, as I recall..

The man didn't want to fight. End of story.

All that truly matters is that the man wants to fight NOW. End of
story.

Mike Marron wrote in
:

[snip]

All that truly matters is that the man wants to fight NOW. End of
story.

And-uh he recognises who the real enemy is.... France!

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

Mike Marron wrote in message . ..
(ArtKramr) wrote:
Mike Williamson wrote:

The volunteering for deployment in the F-102 was covered quite
some time ago- during the 2000 Presidential campaign, as I recall..

The man didn't want to fight. End of story.

All that truly matters is that the man wants to fight NOW. End of
story.

I think it matters a bit that we were attacked by Saudi Arabians,
led by a Saudi Arabian exiled to Afghanistan and he wants to fight
Iraq.

Let's elect a President with a better grasp of geography.

And while we're at it, no more oil barons in the White House.

No more chicken-hawks in the Pentagon.

--

FF

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:16:42 -0700, Fred the Red Shirt wrote:

[snip]


I think it matters a bit that we were attacked by Saudi Arabians,
led by a Saudi Arabian exiled to Afghanistan and he wants to fight
Iraq.

By that logic we ought to have attacked Austria before
dealing with Germany "because he vas Austrian you know"

In case you hadn't noticed the Jihadis and Islamists
come in any number of hues and complexions.

The only attractive feature your theory has is that it
buttresses my contention we ought to nuke Marin County.

Let's elect a President with a better grasp of geography.

We elected a President whose grasp of the strategic situation
means we aren't hunkered down by the rat holes those jihadi
clowns would have bolted down had we not acted as it played
out. Iraq was unfinished business. Prior to 9/11 we just gritted
our teeth and carried on. After 9/11 the situation was vastly
different and Iraq as it was could no longer be tolerated.
And speaking of Jihadi scum....
Another one surrendered today. Sounds like progress to me.

And while we're at it, no more oil barons in the White House.

Better an oil baron than a pot-smokin, prevaricatin',
philanderin', draft-dogin', swindlin', sexually harrassin'
shyster and his psycho killer shrew of a wife.

No more chicken-hawks in the Pentagon.

Why not, seems to me they are doing a reasonable job.
And besides it annoys the Dumbocreeps.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source