Bush Flew Fighter Jets During Vietnam

It's just neocon bitterness from a president and vice president who ever went
to war when they damn well should have.

You couldn't kick too hard with Bush going into the Air Guard -- those Century
series fighters -could- easily kill you (so I hear).

But Bush skated out on the last two years of his six year commitment, but then
has the gall to attack Senator Kerry's service. That needs to be confronted.

Bush skipped the last two years of his commitment. He didn't even go through an
officer candidate course.

When I say that Bush attacked Kerry's record, I mean of course that the Bush
campaign attacked Kerry. Bush probably has a little to do with this as he does
with carrying out his presidential functions, which seem to be to act just as a
figurhead.

Walt

"WalterM140" wrote in message
...

But Bush skated out on the last two years of his six year commitment, but
then
has the gall to attack Senator Kerry's service. That needs to be
confronted.


You keep saying that, but you have yet to present any hard evidence of it.

But Bush skated out on the last two years of his six year commitment, but
then
has the gall to attack Senator Kerry's service. That needs to be
confronted.


You keep saying that, but you have yet to present any hard evidence of it.



Hard evidence.

What there is no hard evidence of is of Bush's attendance at a drill after May,
1972, or a photo of him, or anyone who remembers him.

The commanding officer to whom he was support to report in Alabama has said
categorically that Bush -did-not- report. The unit Bush was assigned to in
October 1973 is/was in Denver. Bush was at Harvard.

Bush skipped out on the last two years of his commitment.

Walt

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 09:37:10 +0000, WalterM140 wrote:

But Bush skated out on the last two years of his six year commitment, but
then
has the gall to attack Senator Kerry's service. That needs to be
confronted.


You keep saying that, but you have yet to present any hard evidence of it.



Hard evidence.

What there is no hard evidence of is of Bush's attendance at a drill
after May, 1972, or a photo of him, or anyone who remembers him.

And why should there be a photo? The military isn't Life Magazine
you know.

The commanding officer to whom he was support to report in Alabama has said
categorically that Bush -did-not- report. The unit Bush was assigned to in

And this elderly gentleman's memory from 30 years ago si of course
100% accurate.

October 1973 is/was in Denver. Bush was at Harvard.

The unit in Denver was reportedly a holding unit for adminsitrative
purposes if I understand correctly. Seems an appropriate place to
put someone who's in grad school. The military does allow that you
know.

Bush skipped out on the last two years of his commitment.

Sez you or rather the voices in your head.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

"WalterM140" wrote in message
...

Hard evidence.

What there is no hard evidence of is of Bush's attendance at a drill after
May,
1972, or a photo of him, or anyone who remembers him.


What there is no hard evidence of is Bush being AWOL.

What there is no hard evidence of is Bush being AWOL.


This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for 16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif


Walt

"WalterM140" wrote in message
...

This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for
16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif


It does not show that he was AWOL.

This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for
16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif


It does not show that he was AWOL.


No, you have to draw that inference yourself.

Walt