A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bush Flew Fighter Jets During Vietnam



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 13th 04, 04:41 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WalterM140" wrote in message
...

This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for
16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif


It does not show that he was AWOL.



  #2  
Old July 13th 04, 11:07 AM
WalterM140
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for
16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif


It does not show that he was AWOL.


No, you have to draw that inference yourself.

Walt
  #3  
Old July 13th 04, 01:23 PM
D. Strang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"WalterM140" wrote
This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for
16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif


It does not show that he was AWOL.


No, you have to draw that inference yourself.


AWOL is a violation of the UCMJ, you don't infer it, there are
records.


  #4  
Old July 13th 04, 10:14 PM
ian maclure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:23:46 -0500, D. Strang wrote:

[snip]

AWOL is a violation of the UCMJ, you don't infer it, there are
records.


You'd think so wouldn't you.
Walty and his Dimmocreep buddies have however constructed
their castle in the air which while disturbing is OK I
suppose. Taking up residence therein is grounds to question
their mental integrity.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

  #5  
Old July 13th 04, 01:51 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WalterM140" wrote in message
...

No, you have to draw that inference yourself.


I wouldn't draw that inference. No rational person would.


  #6  
Old July 13th 04, 10:15 PM
ian maclure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:51:55 +0000, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:


"WalterM140" wrote in message
...

No, you have to draw that inference yourself.


I wouldn't draw that inference. No rational person would.


HINT
Walty isn't rationale. He's a broken record Dumbocreep.
/HINT

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

  #7  
Old July 13th 04, 10:00 PM
ian maclure
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:07:11 +0000, WalterM140 wrote:

This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for
16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif


It does not show that he was AWOL.


No, you have to draw that inference yourself.


No, thats not quite true.
Thats the inference YOU WANT folks to draw.
In fact you belabo(u)r the point into insensibility.
Trouble is your thory doesn't hold up under scrutiny.
Tough noogies.

IBM

__________________________________________________ _____________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
The Worlds Uncensored News Source

  #8  
Old July 13th 04, 11:20 PM
Brooks Gregory
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"ian maclure" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:07:11 +0000, WalterM140 wrote:

This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for
16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif



That document is a complete forgery!!! Hell, the forger didn't even know the
proper format for military dates.


--
If you really want to save the
environment, support a family farmer.

Brooks Gregory


  #9  
Old July 15th 04, 02:00 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (WalterM140)
Date: 7/13/2004 5:07 AM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

This documet shows conclusively that Bush performed no service for
16 months:

http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/doc10.gif


It does not show that he was AWOL.


No, you have to draw that inference yourself.

Walt


Walt, for someone who claims to have been in the military you seem peculiarly
ignorant of what a determination of AWOL is. AWOL means absent without official
leave. Since AWOL is a crime under the UCMJ there would have to be
documentation of it somewhere in his or JAG's records. If no one ever charged
Bush with being AWOL he wasn't.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN ChuckSlusarczyk Home Built 105 October 8th 04 12:38 AM
Bush's guard record JDKAHN Home Built 13 October 3rd 04 09:38 PM
Two MOH Winners say Bush Didn't Serve WalterM140 Military Aviation 196 June 14th 04 11:33 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 04:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.