![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I "believe" a part of this is......steep bank, pull stick, keep upper front hinge of cowling on horizon, drop like a "homesick brick". Part of this makes airflow ACROSS the cowling inlets, thus dropping airflow through the engine.
This is NOT a "dive towards the ground"..,,,, Yes, Hank can elaborate if he feels the need to...... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep Charlies, that was I was explaining in my earlier post, hard slip= slow speed, large rate of decent and disrupted airflow into cowl hence keeps the cht up. Works liike a champ but half the guys out there flying have ever done a hard slip and even less use it on a regular basis.
Dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, January 8, 2018 at 7:07:06 PM UTC-5, wrote:
Yep Charlies, that was I was explaining in my earlier post, hard slip= slow speed, large rate of decent and disrupted airflow into cowl hence keeps the cht up. Works liike a champ but half the guys out there flying have ever done a hard slip and even less use it on a regular basis. Dan The L-19 will slip hard enough to dump a lot of fuel overboard if the tanks are full. We don't consider this an operational advantage. Still, in terms of angle off the direction of motion, it isn't that big an angle (guessing 20 degrees, rudder on the floor). Intuitively, I doubt that it is possible to significantly disrupt the intake airflow with a steady state slip. Someone bring the data, prove me wrong. Evan Ludeman / T8 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Evan, the data was found refering to a 6 cylinder cht that we had in our pawnee. Also reconfirmed on a 200hp Stinson also with 6 position cht. Doubt away, the technique does work, been using it for 30 years, have never cracked a cylinder. And regarding your bird dog (glorified 170) venting fuel, I hope your not towing with topped off tanks, that extra weight costs you time and money in the long haul unless where you operate doesn't have handy fuel available. We always operated with 3/4 tanks but note we were flying in extreme density altitude conditions.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will agree the slip angle likely makes minimal difference in engine cooling.
I WILL say a high slip angle makes the tug come down pretty fast with not a lot of airspeed, adding some "G load" at the same time helps as well. Airspeed (straight on or angled) is still flow through the cylinder fins. So.......lower speed and slightly reduced airflow can only help, the slip adds to sink rate. That IS part of the goal....correct? Turnaround time, lack of adding to maintenance..........right? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Debunking Glider Spoiler Turns Causing Spin Thinking | [email protected] | Soaring | 135 | January 7th 18 03:01 AM |
Debunking 911 | The Endeavor | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 22nd 09 12:23 PM |
Aerodynamics acording to Myth Busters! | cavelamb himself[_2_] | Home Built | 51 | November 4th 07 06:56 PM |
Avoiding Shock Cooling in Quick Descent | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 32 | January 21st 04 04:32 AM |
The myth that won't die. | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | December 19th 03 06:15 PM |