![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Lufwaffe Nachtjakgt
Well that looks interesting. The Luftwaffe for a time had to resort to wild boar tactics which involved single engined fighters equipped with special navigation equipment but with no radar. The 'special navigation equipment' carried on Wilde Sau Bf 109s and FW 190s consisted of a UV lamp and specially coated maps. The special nav features of the FuG 16Z were not utilized because they would have required a personal controller for each "Boar", so instead they were following the Reichjägerweile (general information fighter broadcast - "The four-motor bombers are approaching Kassel; all aircraft within range, strong raid approaching Kassel", that sort of thing. No naviads in the cockpits of the Wilde Sau airmen I have interviewed. Quite often when the German radar was working the link between the ground and night fighter was not. They were being jammed and intruded upon for the last two years of the war. When the voice RT was 'stepped on', most NJ pilots had their bordfunkers switch to Morse, which was not as easier to operate in a dirty environment. The introduction of the Bernhard-Bernhardine system improve matters. This system was very jam proof it told a night fighter exactly where was in that provided a secure telemetry to link the night fighter with ground control by a ticker tape. One cool part of that system is that it was the first on earth to provide a blind landing capability, when hooked to a three-axis autopilot. The Interim Nightfighter (Me 262 B-1a/U1) 'version 2' carried this setup, as did a couple captured Ju 88 nightfighters. Berndard was essentially an early datalink system intended for large bombers but it evolved into a fighter director.that was quite advanced for its day. Because the German Lichtenstein radar had large aerials aircraft were slowed down considerably this limited number of interceptions they were able to achieve. Crews often scored 4, 5, or even more Abschusse in a single sortie. Other Experten crews managed up to 7. Faster speed does not help a radar interception of a slow target in low/zero visibility. The night fighter pilots maintained high morale and motivation to the end. In five years this arm of the Luftwaffe underwent greater technical and tactical change than any other branch of the Armed Forces. Probably true, although it should be weighed against the groud attack arm of the airforce, that started the war in some cases with Henschel biplanes and open cockpits and ended with Jets. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR Its always better to lose -an- engine, not -the- engine. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Krztalizer" wrote in message ... The Lufwaffe Nachtjakgt Well that looks interesting. The Luftwaffe for a time had to resort to wild boar tactics which involved single engined fighters equipped with special navigation equipment but with no radar. The 'special navigation equipment' carried on Wilde Sau Bf 109s and FW 190s consisted of a UV lamp and specially coated maps. The special nav features of the FuG 16Z were not utilized because they would have required a personal controller for each "Boar", so instead they were following the Reichjägerweile (general information fighter broadcast - "The four-motor bombers are approaching Kassel; all aircraft within range, strong raid approaching Kassel", that sort of thing. No naviads in the cockpits of the Wilde Sau airmen I have interviewed. I believe these aircraft had artificial horizons, the FuG 16Z, ultraviolet or Radium instrumentation dials. Protecting a fighter pilots night vision was all important, the Luftwaffe even had a device to measure the speed of recovery of eyes after being illuminated by light. The the the wild sow hunted aircraft that had been caught in searchlights. They did perform ground controled interceptions that this was of course limited by the number of Wurzburg radars and oppertators: I believe mosquitoes were the main target. The Me 109G6 U4N was equipped with Naxos to home onto bomber emisions and to also home back to homebase. This type was little used because it came at the end of wild sow tactics when the Luftwaffe had managed to get its radars working again. I believe that great of squadrons in training was between 20 to 75 percent. Finnish pilots trained by the Germans in night fighting had only a 10 percent death rate simply because they were far better trained to start with. The correct translation of "Wilde Sau" Wild Sow not Wild Boar. It alludes to the wild sow's willingness to aggressively defend its young. Quite often when the German radar was working the link between the ground and night fighter was not. They were being jammed and intruded upon for the last two years of the war. When the voice RT was 'stepped on', most NJ pilots had their bordfunkers switch to Morse, which was not as easier to operate in a dirty environment. The introduction of the Bernhard-Bernhardine system improve matters. This system was very jam proof it told a night fighter exactly where was in that provided a secure telemetry to link the night fighter with ground control by a ticker tape. One cool part of that system is that it was the first on earth to provide a blind landing capability, when hooked to a three-axis autopilot. The Interim Nightfighter (Me 262 B-1a/U1) 'version 2' carried this setup, as did a couple captured Ju 88 nightfighters. It is a fascinating system. I Would like to know the technology of it? I have read that the Luftwaffe was heading towards fully automatic interceptions, this system was perhaps only one step away. You have any information on the German EGON system which was similar to "oboe". This was quite an advanced night bombing device on the Luftwaffe's side but I am not sure where it was used if ever. Berndard was essentially an early datalink system intended for large bombers but it evolved into a fighter director.that was quite advanced for its day. Because the German Lichtenstein radar had large aerials aircraft were slowed down considerably this limited number of interceptions they were able to achieve. Crews often scored 4, 5, or even more Abschusse in a single sortie. Other Experten crews managed up to 7. Faster speed does not help a radar interception of a slow target in low/zero visibility. The ideal situation occurred when the night fighter pilots managed to infiltrate into the middle of the bomber stream, it was in this situation that these multiple victories occurred. In the middle of the bomber stream jamming and window was minimal. I believe diversionary raids however frequently lead the night fighters on a fruitless chase: they often were led to the wrong city and then lacked the speed to defend the correct one in time. The night fighter pilots maintained high morale and motivation to the end. In five years this arm of the Luftwaffe underwent greater technical and tactical change than any other branch of the Armed Forces. Probably true, although it should be weighed against the groud attack arm of the airforce, that started the war in some cases with Henschel biplanes and open cockpits and ended with Jets. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR Its always better to lose -an- engine, not -the- engine. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The 'special navigation equipment' carried on Wilde Sau Bf 109s and FW 190s consisted of a UV lamp and specially coated maps. The special nav features of the FuG 16Z were not utilized because they would have required a personal controller for each "Boar", so instead they were following the Reichjägerweile (general information fighter broadcast - "The four-motor bombers are approaching Kassel; all aircraft within range, strong raid approaching Kassel", that sort of thing. No naviads in the cockpits of the Wilde Sau airmen I have interviewed. I believe these aircraft had artificial horizons, the FuG 16Z, ultraviolet or Radium instrumentation dials. The guys I have interviewed were in 10./JG 300 primarily, and they were the only instrument-rated Wilde Sau; the difference is that the rest of the program were basically day fighters, flying under exceptionally good night visibility. As I said before, the only thing they said was different from the standard daylight Bf 109s in use, was the small UV maplight. Its probable that you are right and that other Staffels in the program had slightly better navaids, but it was never intended to use "night-flyers" in the program, just standard day fighter pilots. We had a long conversation with Oberst Herrmann on this exact subject as part of our interview. Protecting a fighter pilots night vision was all important, the Luftwaffe even had a device to measure the speed of recovery of eyes after being illuminated by light. The the the wild sow hunted aircraft that had been caught in searchlights. Yes, as they all said, "The eyes of a hunter is what was needed - no radar, no controller, nothing was more important than excellent night vision." I heard that from every NJG pilot we tracked down. They did perform ground controled interceptions that this was of course limited by the number of Wurzburg radars and oppertators: Not during the actual Wilde Sau program, but following its termination, they did exactly this. Once the rest of JG 300 went back to exclusively daylight combat, the sole remaining nightfighter Staffel in JG 300 (the massively overstrength 10th Staffel at Jüterbog), THEN controllers were used to guide single Bf 109s toward their targets. From what I have been told, this was not done during the earlier period, when Wilde Sau's were primarily hunting Viermots over citiesl I believe mosquitoes were the main target. There were several Mosquito Jagd units, operating from September 44 to April 1945, including NJGr 10, 10./JG 300, two gruppes within NJG 11, etc., but these were all after the Sept 44 demise of the Wilde Sau program. The Me 109G6 U4N was equipped with Naxos to home onto bomber emisions and to also home back to homebase. This type was little used because it came at the end of wild sow tactics when the Luftwaffe had managed to get its radars working again. Also the reluctance of bomber crews to leave the H2S on, since all of them knew by then that their suspicions concerning the Germans homing on it had already been confirmed. A Mosquito was deliberately sent up as bait and it was immediately tracked and attacked by a Naxos-equipped fighter. Later, an H2S was operating on the -ground-, and a Luftwaffe fighter homed onto it. After that incident, crews were quite judicious with its use, and the LW realized it was not going to be an effective tracking tool. I believe that great of squadrons in training was between 20 to 75 percent. Finnish pilots trained by the Germans in night fighting had only a 10 percent death rate simply because they were far better trained to start with. The "airman's death" that met most of the Wilde Sau airmen was caused by their general inexperience, compounded by the rigors of night combat. It was everything the day fighter nachwuchs faced, multiplied many times. Its a wonder any of them made it through more than a flight or two. The correct translation of "Wilde Sau" Wild Sow not Wild Boar. It alludes to the wild sow's willingness to aggressively defend its young. I know their songs ![]() airmen "old lady pigs", so I used Boars - my mistake, but it was intentional. Quite often when the German radar was working the link between the ground and night fighter was not. They were being jammed and intruded upon for the last two years of the war. When the voice RT was 'stepped on', most NJ pilots had their bordfunkers switch to Morse, which was not as easier to operate in a dirty environment. I meant to say it was easier to operate in that environment. Silly slip.... The introduction of the Bernhard-Bernhardine system improve matters. This system was very jam proof it told a night fighter exactly where was in that provided a secure telemetry to link the night fighter with ground control by a ticker tape. One cool part of that system is that it was the first on earth to provide a blind landing capability, when hooked to a three-axis autopilot. The Interim Nightfighter (Me 262 B-1a/U1) 'version 2' carried this setup, as did a couple captured Ju 88 nightfighters. It is a fascinating system. I Would like to know the technology of it? Look up the K-22 automatic pilot. If you send me a note off board, I will forward some more info about it. I have read that the Luftwaffe was heading towards fully automatic interceptions, this system was perhaps only one step away. Very close. Allies were always only a step behind, but by late 1944, early 1945, the night arm of the Luftwaffe was playing with amazing toys. You have any information on the German EGON system which was similar to "oboe". This was quite an advanced night bombing device on the Luftwaffe's side but I am not sure where it was used if ever. Sorry - its at the PRO in England. I focus on nightfighters over Europe, so I didn't copy that file when I saw it. Berndard was essentially an early datalink system intended for large bombers but it evolved into a fighter director.that was quite advanced for its day. Because the German Lichtenstein radar had large aerials aircraft were slowed down considerably this limited number of interceptions they were able to achieve. Crews often scored 4, 5, or even more Abschusse in a single sortie. Other Experten crews managed up to 7. Faster speed does not help a radar interception of a slow target in low/zero visibility. The ideal situation occurred when the night fighter pilots managed to infiltrate into the middle of the bomber stream, it was in this situation that these multiple victories occurred. In the middle of the bomber stream jamming and window was minimal. Yes - like piranhas in a fishtank, no place for the bombers to turn... I believe diversionary raids however frequently lead the night fighters on a fruitless chase: they often were led to the wrong city and then lacked the speed to defend the correct one in time. Exactly so. Other times, they sat in their cockpits on the ground watching a distant city burn, as their flight controllers denied them permission to launch, supposedly because the target was not yet known. For the pilots, it was unbearable. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR Its always better to lose -an- engine, not -the- engine. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
regaining night currency but not alone | Teacherjh | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | May 28th 04 02:08 PM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
Night of the bombers - the most daring special mission of Finnishbombers in WW2 | Jukka O. Kauppinen | Military Aviation | 4 | March 22nd 04 11:19 PM |
Why did Britain win the BoB? | Grantland | Military Aviation | 79 | October 15th 03 03:34 PM |